These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21236637)

  • 1. Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss.
    Dehqan A; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):e61-5. PubMed ID: 21236637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic features of voice in patients with severe hearing loss.
    Mora R; Crippa B; Cervoni E; Santomauro V; Guastini L
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22498262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of aging on acoustic parameters of voice.
    Dehqan A; Scherer RC; Dashti G; Ansari-Moghaddam A; Fanaie S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(6):265-70. PubMed ID: 23328404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices.
    Dehqan A; Ansari H; Bakhtiar M
    J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19230602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation.
    Evans MK; Deliyski DD
    J Voice; 2007 Nov; 21(6):669-82. PubMed ID: 16952440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters.
    Hocevar-Boltezar I; Vatovec J; Gros A; Zargi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 15939488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Voice Analysis in Iranian Post-lingual Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aghaei F; Khoramshahi H; Zamani P; Dehqan A; Hesam S
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):795.e11-795.e20. PubMed ID: 34857450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing Aid Use and Auditory Verbal Therapy Improve Voice Quality of Deaf Children.
    Tejeda-Franco CD; Valadez-Jimenez VM; Hernandez-Lopez X; Ysunza PA; Mena-Ramirez ME; Garcia-Zalapa RA; Miranda-Duarte A
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):301.e7-301.e11. PubMed ID: 30224309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Period for Normalization of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Indian Pediatric Cochlear Implantees.
    Joy JV; Deshpande S; Vaid DN
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):391.e19-391.e25. PubMed ID: 28029557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of hearing aid amplification on voice F0 variability in speakers with prelingual hearing loss.
    Lee GS; Liu C; Lee SH
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():1-8. PubMed ID: 23648550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vocal characteristics during child development: perceptual-auditory and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Lima IL; Azevedo EH; de Lima-Silva MF; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida LN; de Almeida AA
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 24296522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice quality of prepubescent children with quiescent recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
    Lindman JP; Gibbons MD; Morlier R; Wiatrak BJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 May; 68(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 15081224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice change in end-stage renal disease patients after hemodialysis: correlation of subjective hoarseness and objective acoustic parameters.
    Jung SY; Ryu JH; Park HS; Chung SM; Ryu DR; Kim HS
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 24275458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.