245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21236746)
1. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy.
Mouilhade F; Matsoukis J; Oger P; Mandereau C; Brzakala V; Dujardin F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Feb; 97(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 21236746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision. Review of a continuous series of 103 cases.
Mandereau C; Brzakala V; Matsoukis J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 22209043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results.
Laffosse JM; Chiron P; Molinier F; Bensafi H; Puget J
Int Orthop; 2007 Oct; 31(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 17053875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.
Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Minimally invasive anterolateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: seven-year results].
Musil D; Stehlík J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 23562258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterolateral muscle sparing approach total hip arthroplasty: an anatomic and clinical study.
Zhang XL; Shen H; Qin XL; Wang Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1358-63. PubMed ID: 18959109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterolateral mini-invasive versus posterior mini-invasive approach for primary total hip replacement. Comparison of exposure and implant positioning.
Laffosse JM; Accadbled F; Molinier F; Chiron P; Hocine B; Puget J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 17639434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In the absence of evidence--why bother? A literature review of minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery.
Woolson ST
Instr Course Lect; 2006; 55():189-93. PubMed ID: 16958453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Minimally invasive total hip replacement--one-year results].
Stehlík J; Musil D; Held M; Stárek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18760081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive total hip replacement with the patient in the supine position and the contralateral leg elevated.
Graf R; Azizbaig-Mohajer M
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Oct; 18(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 17103130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach.
Bernasek TL; Lee WS; Lee HJ; Lee JS; Kim KH; Yang JJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Nov; 130(11):1349-54. PubMed ID: 20069429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgery for femoroacetabular impingement using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach: analysis of 118 cases at 2.2-year follow-up.
Chiron P; Espié A; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Molinier F; Laffosse JM
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22257764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach.
Laffosse JM; Chiron P; Accadbled F; Molinier F; Tricoire JL; Puget J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Dec; 72(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 17260606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large diameter head metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results.
Mertl P; Boughebri O; Havet E; Triclot P; Lardanchet JF; Gabrion A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 20170852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive total hip replacement via the anterolateral approach in the supine position.
Pflüger G; Junk-Jantsch S; Schöll V
Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7-11. PubMed ID: 17668206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results.
Hartzband MA
Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 15062697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.
Müller M; Schwachmeyer V; Tohtz S; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C; Heller MO
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 May; 132(5):725-31. PubMed ID: 22294091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year.
Martin R; Clayson PE; Troussel S; Fraser BP; Docquier PL
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1362-72. PubMed ID: 21435823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-incision direct lateral approach versus anterior mini-invasive approach in total hip replacement: results 1 year after surgery.
Pogliacomi F; De Filippo M; Paraskevopoulos A; Alesci M; Marenghi P; Ceccarelli F
Acta Biomed; 2012 Aug; 83(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 23393919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Total hip replacement from a MIS-AL approach (comparison with a standard anterolateral approach)].
Kubes J; Landor I; Podskubka A; Majernícek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Aug; 76(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 19755052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
