These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21237179)

  • 1. Sampling and assessment accuracy in mate choice: a random-walk model of information processing in mating decision.
    Castellano S; Cermelli P
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Apr; 274(1):161-9. PubMed ID: 21237179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational mate choice: theory and empirical evidence.
    Castellano S; Cadeddu G; Cermelli P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 22410366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision.
    Castellano S; Cermelli P
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 16712871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition.
    Phelps SM; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Jan; 167(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 16475097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making.
    Chittka L; Skorupski P; Raine NE
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jul; 24(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 19409649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
    Candolin U; Salesto T
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Female choice for heterozygous mates changes along successive matings in a lizard.
    Laloi D; Eizaguirre C; Fédérici P; Massot M
    Behav Processes; 2011 Nov; 88(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 21889973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal.
    Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations.
    Roberts SC
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3121-3. PubMed ID: 19682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits and the maintenance of genetic diversity in song sparrows.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19032502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate-choice copying as Bayesian decision making.
    Uehara T; Yokomizo H; Iwasa Y
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 15729669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.