BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21239008)

  • 1. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.
    Eggener SE; Scardino PT; Walsh PC; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Wood DP; Eastham JA; Yossepowitch O; Rabah DM; Kattan MW; Yu C; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 21239008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era.
    Stephenson AJ; Kattan MW; Eastham JA; Bianco FJ; Yossepowitch O; Vickers AJ; Klein EA; Wood DP; Scardino PT
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Sep; 27(26):4300-5. PubMed ID: 19636023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nomograms to predict the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men: comparison with western predictive tools using decision curve analysis.
    Jeong CW; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Lee SB; Ku JH; Byun SS; Jeong H; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee E; Lee SE
    Int J Urol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):846-52. PubMed ID: 22587373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schnall M; Tomaszewski J; Schultz D; Kao G; VanArsdalen K; Wein A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 7928457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.
    Partin AW; Kattan MW; Subong EN; Walsh PC; Wojno KJ; Oesterling JE; Scardino PT; Pearson JD
    JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1445-51. PubMed ID: 9145716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familial prostate cancer: a different disease?
    Kupelian PA; Klein EA; Witte JS; Kupelian VA; Suh JH
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2197-201. PubMed ID: 9366343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific antigen density as a prognosticator of pathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Trock BJ; Humphreys EB; Partin AW; Han M; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1780-4; discussion 1784. PubMed ID: 18343439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Has there been a recent shift in the pathological features and prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy?
    Soh S; Kattan MW; Berkman S; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 1997 Jun; 157(6):2212-8. PubMed ID: 9146618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
    Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
    Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram.
    Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sood A; Sammon JD; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Diaz M; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M
    BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 25413443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Diamand R; Ploussard G; Roumiguié M; Oderda M; Benamran D; Fiard G; Quackels T; Assenmacher G; Simone G; Van Damme J; Malavaud B; Iselin C; Descotes JL; Roche JB; Peltier A; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S
    Eur Urol; 2021 Feb; 79(2):180-185. PubMed ID: 33023770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy.
    Amin A; Partin A; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1286-90. PubMed ID: 21862072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.
    Teeter AE; Bañez LL; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1980-4; discussion 1985. PubMed ID: 18801519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical, Pathological and Oncologic Findings of Radical Prostatectomy with Extraprostatic Extension Diagnosed on Preoperative Prostate Biopsy.
    Faisal FA; Tosoian JJ; Han M; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Lotan TL
    J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):937-942. PubMed ID: 30414957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.