These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21239395)

  • 21. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.
    Isci D; Turk T; Elekdag-Turk S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):706-15. PubMed ID: 20457582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determinants of successful chincup therapy in skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ko YI; Baek SH; Mah J; Yang WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 15224056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in bimaxillary osteotomies: single-piece versus 3-piece maxilla.
    Kretschmer WB; Baciut G; Baciut M; Zoder W; Wangerin K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 20116710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel.
    Levin AS; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T; Fränkel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):513-24. PubMed ID: 18929269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of tongue appliance on the maxilla in Class III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(3):11-4. PubMed ID: 19835181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maxillary protraction: different effects on facial morphology in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Tindlund RS; Rygh P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Mar; 30(2):208-21. PubMed ID: 8452843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
    Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children.
    Deguchi T; Kanomi R; Ashizawa Y; Rosenstein SW
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 10456603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dental arch changes following rapid maxillary expansion.
    Mutinelli S; Cozzani M; Manfredi M; Bee M; Siciliani G
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):469-76. PubMed ID: 18791124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Class III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure.
    Baek SH; Kim K; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2049-54. PubMed ID: 19881370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.