170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21239573)
1. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.
Parrott LA; Ng SY
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21239573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Letter to the editor concerning Parrott LA, Ng SY. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study published in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2001;40:102-109).
Flygare L; Ohman A; Kull L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):262-3. PubMed ID: 21493884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rectangular collimation and radiographic efficacy in eight general dental practices in the West Midlands.
Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
Prim Dent Care; 2004 Jul; 11(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 15242564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of technical errors in pediatric bitewing radiographs acquired with round vs rectangular collimation.
Campbell RE; Anderson D; Strauss K; Brown C; Fenchel M; Wilson S; Scarfe W
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Mar; 133(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 34627711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating cone cut in rectangular collimation in intraoral radiography: application of ALADA and radiation stewardship.
Clark-Perry D; Berkhout WER; Sanderink GC; Slot DE
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5391-5402. PubMed ID: 37537518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital intraoral imaging: analysis of retakes and reduction in radiation exposure using rectangular collimation.
Vijayan S; Shah N; Potluri A
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(6):66-70. PubMed ID: 36288078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.
Taylor GK; Macpherson LM
Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(9):563-8; discussion 541. PubMed ID: 15131628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic equipment and techniques used in general dental practice: a survey of general dental practitioners in England and Wales.
Tugnait A; Clerehugh V; Hirschmann PN
J Dent; 2003 Mar; 31(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 12726704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.
Johnson KB; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Aug; 89(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 26304948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Errors generated with the use of rectangular collimation.
Parks ET
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 2052340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bitewing radiography dosimetry of a stationary intraoral tomosynthesis imaging system.
Johnson KB; LaPrade JC; Platin E; Broome AM; Ludlow JB; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Dec; 130(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 32665203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kerma area product (KAP) and scatter measurements for intraoral X-ray machines using three different types of round collimation compared with rectangular beam limiter.
Magill D; Ngo NJH; Felice MA; Mupparapu M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180183. PubMed ID: 30346798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of beam collimation on image quality.
Peterson CA; Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Platin E; Tangen CM
J Dent Hyg; 1997; 71(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9470560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oblique lateral radiographs and bitewings; estimation of organ doses in head and neck region with Monte Carlo calculations.
Aps JK; Scott JM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130419. PubMed ID: 24834483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of bitewing radiographs in children in relation to the type of film holder used.
Herman HD; Ashkenazi M
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23595621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP-ORA: a three-function dental X-ray film positioning device for taking anterior and posterior periapical and bitewing intraoral radiographs.
Mamoun JS
Dent Assist; 2011; 80(3):38-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 21739876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alignment errors in bitewing radiographs using uncoupled positioning devices.
Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8508940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure in dental radiology: a 1998 nationwide survey in Switzerland.
Aroua A; Buchillier-Decka I; Dula K; Nedjadi Y; Perrier M; Vader JP; Valley JF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):211-9. PubMed ID: 15533973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
