These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21239573)

  • 21. Radiation doses in extraoral bitewing radiography compared with intraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.
    Dorsey AK; Mol A; Green P; Ludlow J; Johnson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Feb; 137(2):182-189. PubMed ID: 37914543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bitewing film quality: a clinical comparison of the loop vs. holder techniques.
    Kositbowornchai S; Phadannorg T; Permpoonsinsook M; Thinkhamrop B
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 15119720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of three periapical radiographic techniques for endodontic working length estimation.
    Kazzi D; Horner K; Qualtrough AC; Martinez-Beneyto Y; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):526-31. PubMed ID: 17459119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence on radiation dose reduction using rectangular collimation: a systematic review.
    Shetty A; Almeida FT; Ganatra S; Senior A; Pacheco-Pereira C
    Int Dent J; 2019 Apr; 69(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 29959778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students.
    Choksi SK; Rao MS
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of radiation exposure with Tru-Align intraoral rectangular collimation system using OSL dosimeters.
    Goren AD; Bonvento MJ; Fernandez TJ; Abramovitch K; Zhang W; Roe N; Seltzer J; Steinberg M; Colosi DC
    N Y State Dent J; 2011 Mar; 77(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 21678866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of rectangular and cylindrical collimation for intraoral radiographs.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Nelson JF; Kohout FJ; Kienzle GC
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Dec; 47(12):771-3. PubMed ID: 6582105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation dose reduction using novel size 1 and size 0 rectangular collimators in pediatric dental imaging.
    Mupparapu M; Bass T; Axline D; Felice M; Magill D
    Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(6):502-509. PubMed ID: 32368765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A survey on radiation exposure reduction methods including rectangular collimation for intraoral radiography by pediatric dentists in the United States.
    Campbell RE; Wilson S; Zhang Y; Scarfe WC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Apr; 151(4):287-296. PubMed ID: 32222177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Errors on dental bitewing radiographs.
    Nysether S; Hansen BF
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Oct; 11(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 6578896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A quantitative analysis of dental radiography quality assurance practices among North Carolina dentists.
    Platin E; Janhom A; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9690256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Initial development and in vitro evaluation of the HPL device for obtaining reproducible bitewing radiographs of children.
    Pitts NB; Hamood SS; Longbottom C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 May; 71(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 2047107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of thyroid shielding in intraoral radiography.
    Hoogeveen RC; Hazenoot B; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20150407. PubMed ID: 27008105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intraoral Imaging in Dental Private Practice - A Rectangular Collimator Study.
    Senior A; Tolentino Almeida F; Geha H; Pachêco-Pereira C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2020 Oct; 86():k16. PubMed ID: 33326370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of a samarium compound filter and E-speed film.
    Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Mann GB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):769-73. PubMed ID: 9161270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.