These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21239862)

  • 1. Matching simulated antemortem and post-mortem dental radiographs from human skulls by dental students and experts: testing skills for pattern recognition.
    Wenzel A; Richards A; Heidmann J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2010 Dec; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 21239862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography.
    Andersen L; Wenzel A
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Mar; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification.
    Tohnak S; Mehnert AJ; Mahoney M; Crozier S
    J Dent Res; 2007 Nov; 86(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 17959896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discrimination potential of radio-opaque composite restorations for identification: part 3.
    Zondag H; Phillips VM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 22717956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 2.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22717955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of additional teaching of final-year dental students on their radiographic diagnosis of caries.
    Wrbas KT; Kielbassa AM; Schulte-Mönting J; Hellwig E
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2000 Aug; 4(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11168478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: influence of operator qualifications and cognitive bias.
    Pinchi V; Norelli GA; Caputi F; Fassina G; Pradella F; Vincenti C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 22770720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical relevance of prescribing superimposition for determining a frontal sinus pattern match.
    Hashim N; Hemalatha N; Thangaraj K; Kareem A; Ahmed A; Hassan NF; Jayaprakash PT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Aug; 253():137.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26103928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental hygiene students' matching accuracy when comparing antemortem dental radiographs and oral photographs to simulated postmortem WinID3
    Bradshaw BT; Hunt AW; Ludwig E; Newcomb TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 36380500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental Hygiene and Dental Assistant Students' Simulated DVI Radiographic Match Accuracy: A pilot study.
    Vest SC; Bradshaw BT; Voelker MA; Bruhn AM; Newcomb TL; Sikdar S
    J Dent Hyg; 2023 Apr; 97(2):31-38. PubMed ID: 37068885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison.
    Trochesset DA; Serchuk RB; Colosi DC
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 24328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification.
    Fischman SL
    Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 3867636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
    Wenzel A; Andersen L
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Experience and Training on Dental Students' Examination Performance Regarding Panoramic Images.
    Turgeon DP; Lam EW
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26834133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of dental registrations in forensic odontology among dentists and dental students.
    Sand LP; Rasmusson LG; Borrman H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9227084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triangular geometry-based novel feature and a novel algorithm for human identification using dental radiographs.
    Raju J; Modi CK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Jul; 37(5):317-26. PubMed ID: 23773149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.