155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21241439)
1. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research governance as a facilitator for ethical and timely research? Learning from the experience of a large government-funded multisite research project.
Smith-Merry JL; Walton MM
Aust Health Rev; 2014 Jun; 38(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24870355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.
Duplancic C; Crough T; Bell SC;
Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30417974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.
Hicks SC; James RE; Wong N; Tebbutt NC; Wilson K;
Med J Aust; 2009 Sep; 191(5):280-2. PubMed ID: 19740053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges in obtaining research ethics and governance approvals for an Australian national intersector, multisite audit study.
Buck K; Nolte L; Kelly H; Detering K; Sinclair C; White BP; Sellars M
Aust Health Rev; 2020 Sep; 44(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 32943137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects.
Iedema RA; Allen S; Britton K; Hor S
Aust Health Rev; 2013 May; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 23257167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research ethics board approval for an international thromboprophylaxis trial.
Lutz K; Wilton K; Zytaruk N; Julien L; Hall R; Harvey J; Skrobik Y; Vlahakis N; Meade L; Matte A; Meade M; Burns K; Albert M; Cash BB; Vallance S; Klinger J; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D;
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22305662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HoMER - an opportunity or threat to general practice research?
Liaw ST
Aust Fam Physician; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1016-7. PubMed ID: 22146336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
Dockerty JD; Elwood M
N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.
Hollingworth S; Mckavanagh D; McPherson I; Walpole E; Yu SY
Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):389-392. PubMed ID: 33503401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
Evers JL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.
Boult M; Fitzpatrick K; Maddern G; Fitridge R
ANZ J Surg; 2011 Mar; 81(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 21342383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
