These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21241439)

  • 1. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
    Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
    Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
    Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
    Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research governance as a facilitator for ethical and timely research? Learning from the experience of a large government-funded multisite research project.
    Smith-Merry JL; Walton MM
    Aust Health Rev; 2014 Jun; 38(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24870355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
    White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
    Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.
    Duplancic C; Crough T; Bell SC;
    Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30417974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.
    Hicks SC; James RE; Wong N; Tebbutt NC; Wilson K;
    Med J Aust; 2009 Sep; 191(5):280-2. PubMed ID: 19740053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
    van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
    Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
    Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
    Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenges in obtaining research ethics and governance approvals for an Australian national intersector, multisite audit study.
    Buck K; Nolte L; Kelly H; Detering K; Sinclair C; White BP; Sellars M
    Aust Health Rev; 2020 Sep; 44(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 32943137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Out of the frying pan? Streamlining the ethics review process of multisite qualitative research projects.
    Iedema RA; Allen S; Britton K; Hor S
    Aust Health Rev; 2013 May; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 23257167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research ethics board approval for an international thromboprophylaxis trial.
    Lutz K; Wilton K; Zytaruk N; Julien L; Hall R; Harvey J; Skrobik Y; Vlahakis N; Meade L; Matte A; Meade M; Burns K; Albert M; Cash BB; Vallance S; Klinger J; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D;
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22305662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
    Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HoMER - an opportunity or threat to general practice research?
    Liaw ST
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1016-7. PubMed ID: 22146336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
    Dockerty JD; Elwood M
    N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.
    Hollingworth S; Mckavanagh D; McPherson I; Walpole E; Yu SY
    Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):389-392. PubMed ID: 33503401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
    Evers JL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
    Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.
    Boult M; Fitzpatrick K; Maddern G; Fitridge R
    ANZ J Surg; 2011 Mar; 81(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 21342383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.