These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21242165)

  • 1. Monte Carlo simulations of the electric field close to the body in realistic environments for application in personal radiofrequency dosimetry.
    Iskra S; McKenzie R; Cosic I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):517-27. PubMed ID: 21242165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal RF dosimetry.
    Iskra S; McKenzie R; Cosic I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 20123893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival.
    Bahillo A; Blas J; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Mazuelas S; Abril EJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public.
    Joseph W; Vermeeren G; Verloock L; Heredia MM; Martens L
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 18695413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo modeling for individual monitoring.
    Gualdrini G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 17533157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo study of a 60Co calibration field of the Dosimetry Laboratory Seibersdorf.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):153-6. PubMed ID: 17337744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of whole-body SAR from electromagnetic fields using personal exposure meters.
    Joseph W; Vermeeren G; Verloock L; Martens L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 May; 31(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 20041435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods of evaluating human exposure to electromagnetic fields radiated from operating base stations in Korea.
    Kim BC; Choi HD; Park SO
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Oct; 29(7):579-82. PubMed ID: 18412140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the safety assessment of human exposure in the proximity of cellular communications base-station antennas at 900, 1800 and 2170 MHz.
    Martínez-Búrdalo M; Martín A; Anguiano M; Villar R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4125-37. PubMed ID: 16177535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personal dosimetry in terms of HP(3): Monte Carlo and experimental studies.
    Ferrari P; Gualdrini G; Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Monteventi F; Morelli B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):145-8. PubMed ID: 17261537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2339-52. PubMed ID: 16625046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of electromagnetic polarization on the whole-body averaged SAR in children for plane-wave exposures.
    Hirata A; Ito N; Fujiwara O
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):N59-65. PubMed ID: 19141885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electromagnetic field measurements using personal exposimeters.
    Knafl U; Lehmann H; Riederer M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Feb; 29(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 17929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainties in external dosimetry: analytical vs. Monte Carlo method.
    Behrens R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 19942627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: a simulation study.
    Neubauer G; Cecil S; Giczi W; Petric B; Preiner P; Fröhlich J; Röösli M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Oct; 31(7):535-45. PubMed ID: 20564178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo evaluated parameters for internal dosimetry.
    Gualdrini G; Ferrari P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):157-60. PubMed ID: 17553866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement and simulation of lineal energy distribution at the CERN high energy facility with a tissue equivalent proportional counter.
    Rollet S; Autischer M; Beck P; Latocha M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):425-8. PubMed ID: 17277327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.