These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21242165)

  • 21. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias and uncertainty of penetrating photon dose measured by film dosemeters in an epidemiological study of US nuclear workers.
    Daniels RD; Schubauer-Berigan MK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 15769802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI.
    Crozier S; Wang H; Trakic A; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1236-54. PubMed ID: 17969133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo based voxel phantoms for in vivo internal dosimetry.
    Ros JM; Moraleda M; López MA; Navarro T; Navarro JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 17449911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. FDTD calculation of whole-body average SAR in adult and child models for frequencies from 30 MHz to 3 GHz.
    Wang J; Fujiwara O; Kodera S; Watanabe S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4119-27. PubMed ID: 16912372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In-situ electric field and current density in Japanese male and female models for uniform magnetic field exposures.
    Hirata A; Wake K; Watanabe S; Taki M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Aug; 135(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19628703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Calculated SAR distributions in a human voxel phantom due to the reflection of electromagnetic fields from a ground plane between 65 MHz and 2 GHz.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2277-89. PubMed ID: 18401062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 60-Hertz electric-field exposures in transmission line towers.
    Bracken T; Senior R; Dudman J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Sep; 2(9):444-55. PubMed ID: 16048846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of numerical phantoms by MRI for RF electromagnetic dosimetry: a female model.
    Mazzurana M; Sandrini L; Vaccari A; Malacarne C; Cristoforetti L; Pontalti R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 15550719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of a diffusion model for the assessment of halogen gas exposure during dosing of brominators.
    Shade WD; Jayjock MA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 9183836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets.
    ; Trakic A; Wang H; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1261-77. PubMed ID: 17969138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On-body calibration and measurements using personal radiofrequency exposimeters in indoor diffuse and specular environments.
    Aminzadeh R; Thielens A; Bamba A; Kone L; Gaillot DP; Lienard M; Martens L; Joseph W
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2016 Jul; 37(5):298-309. PubMed ID: 27121268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):166-9. PubMed ID: 17846027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo simulation of the operational quantities at the realistic mixed neutron-photon radiation fields CANEL and SIGMA.
    Lacoste V; Gressier V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17578872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of the uncertainty in internal dose estimate resulting from biological stochastic variability of excretion.
    Molokanov A; Blanchardon E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):561-4. PubMed ID: 17848381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.