These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21243592)
1. [Evaluation of results after total hip replacement using a minimally invasive and a conventional approach. Clinical scores and gait analysis]. Sander K; Layher F; Babisch J; Roth A Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Apr; 149(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 21243592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Measurement of ground reaction forces after total hip arthroplasty using different surgical approaches]. Leuchte S; Luchs A; Wohlrab D Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2007; 145(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17345547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Immediate post-operative advantages of minimally invasive hip replacement - results of symmetry and load from the measurement of ground reaction force]. Leuchte S; Riedl K; Wohlrab D Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 19263317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. Reininga IH; Wagenmakers R; van den Akker-Scheek I; Stant AD; Groothoff JW; Bulstra SK; Zijlstra W; Stevens M BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Jan; 8():4. PubMed ID: 17214906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation]. Wohlrab D; Hagel A; Hein W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 15614648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out. Basad E; Ishaque B; Stürz H; Jerosch J Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):473-8, viii. PubMed ID: 19773052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach. Müller M; Schwachmeyer V; Tohtz S; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C; Heller MO Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 May; 132(5):725-31. PubMed ID: 22294091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional recovery of muscles after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Ward SR; Jones RE; Long WT; Thomas DJ; Dorr LD Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():249-54. PubMed ID: 18399587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of gait in patients following a computer-navigated minimally invasive anterior approach and a conventional posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reininga IH; Stevens M; Wagenmakers R; Boerboom AL; Groothoff JW; Bulstra SK; Zijlstra W J Orthop Res; 2013 Feb; 31(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 22886805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. Meneghini RM; Smits SA; Swinford RR; Bahamonde RE J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):68-73. PubMed ID: 18722305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes. Hamel MB; Toth M; Legedza A; Rosen MP Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 168(13):1430-40. PubMed ID: 18625924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint decisions. Hobson K US News World Rep; 2003 Dec; 135(22):50-1. PubMed ID: 14712784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes. Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: techniques and results to date. Duwelius PJ Instr Course Lect; 2006; 55():215-22. PubMed ID: 16958457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches--a randomized controlled trial. Foucher KC; Wimmer MA; Moisio KC; Hildebrand M; Berli MC; Walker MR; Berger RA; Galante JO J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 21075378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tackling the learning curve: comparison between the anterior, minimally invasive (Micro-hip®) and the lateral, transgluteal (Bauer) approach for primary total hip replacement. Sendtner E; Borowiak K; Schuster T; Woerner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 May; 131(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 20721570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversed assembly of total hip arthroplasty components: a surgical tip to facilitate implant reduction during minimally invasive surgery. Kosashvili Y; Arami A; Heller S; Velkes S; Gollish J Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():235-8. PubMed ID: 23700181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive total hip replacement. Tang Z Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2004 Aug; (60):1-4. PubMed ID: 15311442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive hip resurfacing compared to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Swank ML; Alkire MR Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 19583536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]