These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21245554)

  • 21. Strong nitrogenous and agro-wastewater: current technological overview and future direction.
    Choi E; Yun Z; Chung TH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):1-5. PubMed ID: 15137400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of a membrane bioreactor system for opto-electronic industrial wastewater treatment--a pilot study.
    Chen TK; Chen JN; Ni CH; Lin GT; Chang CY
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):195-202. PubMed ID: 14682587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Removal efficiency of 66 pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment process in Japan.
    Okuda T; Kobayashi Y; Nagao R; Yamashita N; Tanaka H; Tanaka S; Fujii S; Konishi C; Houwa I
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 18192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improvement in the removal of micropollutants at Porto Marghera industrial wastewaters treatment plant by MBR technology.
    Cattaneo S; Marciano F; Masotti L; Vecchiato G; Verlicchi P; Zaffaroni C
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1789-96. PubMed ID: 19029720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.
    Santos A; Judd S
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment.
    Joss A; Keller E; Alder AC; Göbel A; McArdell CS; Ternes T; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3139-52. PubMed ID: 16043210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biological nutrient removal in an MBR treating municipal wastewater with special focus on biological phosphorus removal.
    Monclús H; Sipma J; Ferrero G; Rodriguez-Roda I; Comas J
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(11):3984-91. PubMed ID: 20137918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel application of oxygen-transferring membranes to improve anaerobic wastewater treatment.
    Kappell AS; Semmens MJ; Novak PJ; LaPara TM
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Feb; 89(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 15643630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of a full-scale membrane bioreactor system in treating municipal wastewater for reuse purposes.
    Zanetti F; De Luca G; Sacchetti R
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(10):3768-71. PubMed ID: 20093005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
    Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reverse osmosis followed by activated carbon filtration for efficient removal of organic micropollutants from river bank filtrate.
    Kegel FS; Rietman BM; Verliefde AR
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2603-10. PubMed ID: 20453334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined MBR with photocatalysis/ozonation for bromoamine acid removal.
    Qu YY; Yang Q; Zhou JT; Gou M; Xing LL; Ma F
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 159(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 19140028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an MBR-RO system to produce high quality reuse water: microbial control, DBP formation and nitrate.
    Comerton AM; Andrews RC; Bagley DM
    Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):3982-90. PubMed ID: 16112164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Beier S; Köster S; Veltmann K; Schröder H; Pinnekamp J
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(7):1691-8. PubMed ID: 20371926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Gans O; Martinez E; Kreuzinger N; Kroiss H
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4797-807. PubMed ID: 16242170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
    Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants.
    Llop A; Borrull F; Pocurull E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treating municipal wastewater with the goal of resource recovery.
    Sutton PM; Melcer H; Schraa OJ; Togna AP
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21245549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.