These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2124578)

  • 1. Comparison of three new nonculture tests in the diagnosis of Chlamydia genital infections.
    Schubiner HH; Lebar W; Jemal C; Hershman B
    J Adolesc Health Care; 1990 Nov; 11(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 2124578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
    Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
    Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
    Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the Microtrak enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples.
    Stary A; Teodorowicz L; Hörting-Müller I; Nerad S; Storch M
    Sex Transm Dis; 1994; 21(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 8140485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
    Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Dean D; Ferrero D; McCarthy M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9431928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 system, direct fluorescent-antibody, and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens.
    Iwen PC; Blair TM; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Apr; 95(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 2014785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of urine-based screening strategies to detect Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active asymptomatic young males.
    Shafer MA; Schachter J; Moncada J; Keogh J; Pantell R; Gourlay L; Eyre S; Boyer CB
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(17):2065-70. PubMed ID: 8411573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of four nonculture diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Palayekar VV; Joshi JV; Hazari KT; Shah RS; Chitlange SM
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2000 May; 48(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 11273137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    LeBar W; Herschman B; Jemal C; Pierzchala J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):826-8. PubMed ID: 2663916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection.
    Biro FM; Reising SF; Doughman JA; Kollar LM; Rosenthal SL
    Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.
    Svensson LO; Mares I; Olsson SE; Nordström ML
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. PubMed ID: 1785275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
    Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Chan SW
    Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques.
    Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP
    Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
    Moncada J; Schachter J; Bolan G; Nathan J; Shafer MA; Clark A; Schwebke J; Stamm W; Mroczkowski T; Seliborska Z
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 1478048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection methods in a low-prevalence population in a primary care setting.
    Gann PH; Herrmann JE; Candib L; Hudson RW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1580-5. PubMed ID: 2199520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay for the detection of anogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Tay YK; Goh CL; Chan R; Ali K; Nadarajah M; Sng J
    Singapore Med J; 1995 Apr; 36(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 7676262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.