These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2124590)

  • 1. The role of the PRO physician adviser.
    Crockett W
    Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):842-3. PubMed ID: 2124590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PRO sanctions: a practical guide to the process.
    Darling WD; Gleitz HG
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10302181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work.
    Gosfield AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilization review, DRGs, and physician autonomy.
    Schuch RJ; Levy JA
    J Med Pract Manage; 1986; 2(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10301545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of the principal clinical coordinator in the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Elward KS; Martin D; Merwin E; Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1994; 2(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10161149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review: use it or lose it.
    Dwyer WA
    Med Econ; 1987 Apr; 64(8):25-9. PubMed ID: 10281446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Putting "peer" into PRO.
    Carroll RP
    Tex Med; 1989 Jun; 85(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 2660318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital utilization control by PROs: a guide through the maze.
    Gosfield AG
    Healthspan; 1985 Feb; 2(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 10311126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ever-evolving PRO program. Interview by Mary McNamara Bennett.
    Webber AH
    Internist; 1987 Aug; 28(7):14-7. PubMed ID: 10288607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can peer review go public and survive?
    Peck RL
    Med Econ; 1979 Dec; 56(26):187-9. PubMed ID: 10273189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DRGs and the art of medicine.
    West J Med; 1984 Jan; 140(1):92-3. PubMed ID: 6422643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What does society really want from doctors? The demands of pressure group leaders.
    Med Econ; 1978 May; 55(11):54-61, 64, 67 passim. PubMed ID: 10236782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HEALTHpact plans for small employer: physician's role.
    Stark M
    Med Health R I; 2007 Nov; 90(11):365-6. PubMed ID: 18092490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Medicare peer review organization program: what every physician should known about PRO activities and how to handle notices. A report from the LSMS Physician/Patient Advocacy Committee.
    J La State Med Soc; 1991 Aug; 143(8):31-6. PubMed ID: 1940567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usage review in flux, says panel.
    Zoler ML
    Med World News; 1989 Nov; 30(22):24. PubMed ID: 10296785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting to know and love your PRO.
    Kamens EA
    Conn Med; 1988 May; 52(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 3135983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colorado group develops aid for documentation.
    QA Rev; 1990 Jun; 2(5):2-3. PubMed ID: 10113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What does society really want from doctors? Greater accountability.
    Peck RL
    Med Econ; 1978 May; 55(11):92-6, 99-100, 105 passim. PubMed ID: 10307695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.