These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21246062)

  • 1. Double-blind peer review: a crucial process.
    Lima AF
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Dec; 12(6):423. PubMed ID: 21246062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity.
    Darling ES
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25039807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency.
    Liesegang TJ; Bartley GB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 25457700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Authorship policy of the Journal of Korean Medical Science.
    Hong ST
    J Korean Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(5):657. PubMed ID: 20436697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
    Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
    Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working double-blind.
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):605-6. PubMed ID: 18256621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
    Kramer MS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Editors and authors: two halves of a whole.
    Borus JF
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 38(2):224-5. PubMed ID: 24477900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Authorship and co-authorship].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On peer review.
    Schuklenk U
    Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
    Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Nicholls MG; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van Der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):825-6; discussion 826-7. PubMed ID: 11556304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The manuscript review process.
    Triadafilopoulos G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
    Greaves M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the quality of the peer review process: author and editorial board member perspectives.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Oct; 40(8):701-4. PubMed ID: 23021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.