175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21246217)
1. BR-squared: a practical solution to the winner's curse in genome-wide scans.
Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Faye LL; Paterson AD; Waggott D; ; Bull SB
Hum Genet; 2011 May; 129(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 21246217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate modeling of replication rates in genome-wide association studies by accounting for Winner's Curse and study-specific heterogeneity.
Zou J; Zhou J; Faller S; Brown RP; Sankararaman SS; Eskin E
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36250793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.
Forde A; Hemani G; Ferguson J
PLoS Genet; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e1010546. PubMed ID: 37721937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization.
Jiang T; Gill D; Butterworth AS; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1209-1219. PubMed ID: 36573802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical correction of the Winner's Curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies.
Palmer C; Pe'er I
PLoS Genet; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1006916. PubMed ID: 28715421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A flexible genome-wide bootstrap method that accounts for ranking and threshold-selection bias in GWAS interpretation and replication study design.
Faye LL; Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1898-912. PubMed ID: 21538984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in quantitative-trait association studies.
Xiao R; Boehnke M
Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 21284035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies.
Xiao R; Boehnke M
Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 19140131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power, false discovery rate and Winner's Curse in eQTL studies.
Huang QQ; Ritchie SC; Brozynska M; Inouye M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Dec; 46(22):e133. PubMed ID: 30189032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple yet accurate correction for winner's curse can predict signals discovered in much larger genome scans.
Bigdeli TB; Lee D; Webb BT; Riley BP; Vladimirov VI; Fanous AH; Kendler KS; Bacanu SA
Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2598-603. PubMed ID: 27187203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resampling to Address the Winner's Curse in Genetic Association Analysis of Time to Event.
Poirier JG; Faye LL; Dimitromanolakis A; Paterson AD; Sun L; Bull SB
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 39(7):518-28. PubMed ID: 26411674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies of genome-wide association studies.
Jiang W; Yu W
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3. PubMed ID: 26818952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Illustrating, Quantifying, and Correcting for Bias in Post-hoc Analysis of Gene-Based Rare Variant Tests of Association.
Grinde KE; Arbet J; Green A; O'Connell M; Valcarcel A; Westra J; Tintle N
Front Genet; 2017; 8():117. PubMed ID: 28959274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The projack: a resampling approach to correct for ranking bias in high-throughput studies.
Zhou YH; Wright FA
Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26040912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correcting "winner's curse" in odds ratios from genomewide association findings for major complex human diseases.
Zhong H; Prentice RL
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 19639606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the total number of susceptibility variants underlying complex diseases from genome-wide association studies.
So HC; Yip BH; Sham PC
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13898. PubMed ID: 21103334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-stage study designs combining genome-wide association studies, tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and exome sequencing: accuracy of genetic effect estimates.
Faye LL; Bull SB
BMC Proc; 2011 Nov; 5 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S64. PubMed ID: 22373407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of independent cohorts of outbred CFW mice reveals novel loci for behavioral and physiological traits and identifies factors determining reproducibility.
Zou J; Gopalakrishnan S; Parker CC; Nicod J; Mott R; Cai N; Lionikas A; Davies RW; Palmer AA; Flint J
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias correction for inverse variance weighting Mendelian randomization.
Mounier N; Kutalik Z
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 47(4):314-331. PubMed ID: 37036286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
