BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21246474)

  • 1. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
    Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
    Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
    Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
    Schöpf T; Pichler T
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
    Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
    McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attenuation of X and Gamma Rays in Personal Radiation Shielding Protective Clothing.
    Kozlovska M; Cerny R; Otahal P
    Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S205-11. PubMed ID: 26425983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
    Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
    McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inspection of lead aprons: a practical rejection model.
    Stam W; Pillay M
    Health Phys; 2008 Aug; 95 Suppl 2():S133-6. PubMed ID: 18617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics.
    Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
    Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
    Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shielding properties of lead-free protective clothing and their impact on radiation doses.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Eder H; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4270-80. PubMed ID: 18072491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of a leaden radiation protection barrier for dose reduction for the physician during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions].
    Haipt F; Kirsch M; Hosten N
    Rofo; 2010 Jun; 182(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 19941247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
    Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
    Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defects in new protective aprons.
    Glaze S; LeBlanc AD; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 6729117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.