These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21246474)

  • 1. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
    Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
    Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
    Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
    Schöpf T; Pichler T
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
    Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
    McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attenuation of X and Gamma Rays in Personal Radiation Shielding Protective Clothing.
    Kozlovska M; Cerny R; Otahal P
    Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S205-11. PubMed ID: 26425983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
    Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
    McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inspection of lead aprons: a practical rejection model.
    Stam W; Pillay M
    Health Phys; 2008 Aug; 95 Suppl 2():S133-6. PubMed ID: 18617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics.
    Khazova M; O'Hagan JB; Grainger KJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
    Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
    Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shielding properties of lead-free protective clothing and their impact on radiation doses.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Eder H; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4270-80. PubMed ID: 18072491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of a leaden radiation protection barrier for dose reduction for the physician during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions].
    Haipt F; Kirsch M; Hosten N
    Rofo; 2010 Jun; 182(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 19941247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
    Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
    Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defects in new protective aprons.
    Glaze S; LeBlanc AD; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 6729117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.