154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21247572)
1. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andía D; Mozo de Rosales F; Villasante A; Rivero B; Díez J; Pérez C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 112(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 21247572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Forsmo S; Hansen MH; Jacobsen BK; Oian P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 8604600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16394037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Obstetric outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: six years of experience.
Lima AF; Francisco C; Júlio C; Paula T; Vitorino A; Borrego J
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Oct; 15(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 21959571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Case-control study of obstetrical outcomes of conisation].
Brie C; Turck M; Cheret A; Morello R; Benoist G; Dreyfus M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 26321612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jakobsson M; Gissler M; Sainio S; Paavonen J; Tapper AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):309-13. PubMed ID: 17267829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix.
Klaritsch P; Reich O; Giuliani A; Tamussino K; Haas J; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):604-7. PubMed ID: 16750257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laser vaporization of the cervix is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and rapid labor progression in subsequent pregnancies.
Nitahara K; Fujita Y; Tanaka D; Magarifuchi N; Taniguchi S; Shimamoto T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):895-902. PubMed ID: 33740103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of pregnancies after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
Demeter A; Sziller I; Csapó Z; Szánthó A; Papp Z
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 12094956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone.
Berretta R; Gizzo S; Dall'Asta A; Mazzone E; Monica M; Franchi L; Peri F; Patrelli TS; Bacchi Modena A
Dis Markers; 2013; 35(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 24324288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth.
Jakobsson M; Gissler M; Paavonen J; Tapper AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 19701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A Dutch population-based cohort study with 45,259 pregnancy outcomes.
Loopik DL; van Drongelen J; Bekkers RLM; Voorham QJM; Melchers WJG; Massuger LFAG; van Kemenade FJ; Siebers AG
PLoS Med; 2021 Jun; 18(6):e1003665. PubMed ID: 34086680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery.
Bevis KS; Biggio JR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21345402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical analysis of the effect of cervical conization on fertility and pregnancy outcome].
He HJ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):515-7. PubMed ID: 17983487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenocarcinoma
Kasuga Y; Ikenoue S; Nishio H; Yamagami W; Ochiai D; Tanabe K; Tashima Y; Hirao N; Miyakoshi K; Kasai K; Suda Y; Nemoto T; Shiraishi S; Yoshida H; Kurahashi T; Takamatsu K; Iwasaki S; Yamashita H; Akiba Y; Arase T; Hara S; Nakada S; Tanaka M; Aoki D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9837-9842. PubMed ID: 35341455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coin-shaped" conization.
Kim M; Ishioka S; Endo T; Baba T; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 293(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 26305031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies.
Pinborg A; Ortoft G; Loft A; Rasmussen SC; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 25358346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
