These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21248607)
1. Perspective: The case for research justice: inclusion of patients with limited English proficiency in clinical research. Glickman SW; Ndubuizu A; Weinfurt KP; Hamilton CD; Glickman LT; Schulman KA; Cairns CB Acad Med; 2011 Mar; 86(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 21248607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions. Ernst AA; Fish S Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research. Pullman D J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):523-45. PubMed ID: 12461709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent. Schmidt TA; Lewis RJ; Richardson LD Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16264068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research subjects with limited English proficiency: ethical and legal issues. Resnik DB; Jones CW Account Res; 2006; 13(2):157-77. PubMed ID: 16830406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations. Morris MC Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16264082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network. Willison DJ; Kapral MK; Peladeau P; Richards JA; Fang J; Silver FL BMC Med Ethics; 2006 May; 7():E6. PubMed ID: 16716233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to participate in research studies. Elks ML J Lab Clin Med; 1993 Aug; 122(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 8340698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception. Charuvastra A; Marder SR J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 18316462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of required content of the informed consent process for human participants in biomedical research conducted in the U.S. A practical tool to assist clinical investigators. Chanaud CM Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):501-6. PubMed ID: 18249042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects. J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Including persons with Alzheimer disease in research on comorbid conditions. Wall A IRB; 2009; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19241733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A problem with inclusion in learning disability research. McClimens A; Allmark P Nurs Ethics; 2011 Sep; 18(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21642332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]