151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21248816)
1. Peer review: Trial by Twitter.
Mandavilli A
Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):286-7. PubMed ID: 21248816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Harnessing value of dispersed critiques.
Goldacre B
Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7333):175. PubMed ID: 21307921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Q&A: The global view.
Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
Waheed AA
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What's next for Registered Reports?
Chambers C
Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Future impact: Predicting scientific success.
Acuna DE; Allesina S; Kording KP
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):201-2. PubMed ID: 22972278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scholarship: Beyond the paper.
Priem J
Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):437-40. PubMed ID: 23538811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
Gibson TA
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who stands to lose from double-blind review?
Garvalov BK
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Training peer reviewers.
Mackey DA
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
