246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21251737)
1. The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; van der Veen AJ; Kingma I; Meijer GJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 21251737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.
Busscher I; van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):E35-42. PubMed ID: 20081499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Could junctional problems at the end of a long construct be addressed by providing a graduated reduction in stiffness? A biomechanical investigation.
Durrani A; Jain V; Desai R; Bucklen B; Ingalhalikar A; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(1):E16-22. PubMed ID: 21540778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical function of vertebral body osteophytes, as revealed by experiments on cadaveric spines.
Al-Rawahi M; Luo J; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(10):770-7. PubMed ID: 20683388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posteroanterior stiffness predicts sagittal plane midthoracic range of motion and three-dimensional flexibility in cadaveric spine segments.
Sran MM; Khan KM; Zhu Q; Oxland TR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):806-12. PubMed ID: 15993525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of repeated loading and freeze-thaw cycling on immature bovine thoracic motion segment stiffness.
Sunni N; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):1100-7. PubMed ID: 25406230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine.
Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Weisshaar CL; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071004. PubMed ID: 21823743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous spacer: effects on kinematics, facet loads, and foramen height.
Lazaro BC; Brasiliense LB; Sawa AG; Reyes PM; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):126-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 20173562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].
Zhang J; Lu WW; Ye QB; Qiu GX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 15960256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
