662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2125194)
1. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate].
Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
Wilkoff BL;
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.
Tripp IG; Armstrong GP; Stewart JT; Hood MA; Smith WM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: insights from the Atrial Overdrive Pacing Study.
Kantharia BK; Freedman RA; Hoekenga D; Tomassoni G; Worley S; Sorrentino R; Steinhaus D; Wolkowicz JM; Syed ZA;
Europace; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1024-30. PubMed ID: 17913697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of physiological adaptation of the atrioventricular interval to heart rate in patients chronically paced in the AAIR mode.
Mabo P; Pouillot C; Kermarrec A; Lelong B; Lebreton H; Daubert C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Dec; 14(12):2133-42. PubMed ID: 1723196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrial rate adaptive pacing: what happens to AV conduction?
Linde C; Nordlander R; Rosenqvist M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Oct; 17(10):1581-9. PubMed ID: 7800559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.
De Sisti A; Attuel P; Manot S; Fiorello P; Halimi F; Leclercq JF
Europace; 2000 Oct; 2(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 11194597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with bradycardia].
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Mizumaki K; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Sasayama S
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):503-12. PubMed ID: 1339809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Tse HF; Siu CW; Lee KL; Fan K; Chan HW; Tang MO; Tsang V; Lee SW; Lau CP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2292-7. PubMed ID: 16360061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
