188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21252533)
1. Apparent non-cited overlap between two published articles by the same group of authors.
Cardiology; 2010; 117(3):197. PubMed ID: 21252533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article].
Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R
Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. We are delighted to have received 273 replies from reviewers specifying their subspecialty interests. Introduction.
Frank JD; Mouriquand P; Caldamone A; Malone PS
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):223. PubMed ID: 22583554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
Staff A; Rørtveit G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.
Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A positive review for PLoS ONE.
Zimmer J
Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6000):34. PubMed ID: 20929793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ghostwriting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Publishing biomedical research: roles and responsibilities.
Relman AS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):23-7. PubMed ID: 2376495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Crisis of the scientific communication].
Ramel B
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(37):3514-8. PubMed ID: 14531352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knowledge, wisdom, and impartiality in the new scientific information arena.
Habal MB
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1173-4. PubMed ID: 21778838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
