These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21252735)

  • 81. Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Altman D; Väyrynen T; Engh ME; Axelsen S; Falconer C;
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Jun; 19(6):787-93. PubMed ID: 18074068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Outcomes of trocar-guided Gynemesh PS™ versus single-incision trocarless Polyform™ transvaginal mesh procedures.
    Larouche M; Merovitz L; Correa JA; Walter JE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jan; 26(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25056767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Comparison of two trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh systems for repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lensen EJ; Withagen MI; Kluivers KB; Milani AL; Vierhout ME
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1723-31. PubMed ID: 23636217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Success and failure are dynamic, recurrent event states after surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Jelovsek JE; Gantz MG; Lukacz E; Sridhar A; Zyczynski H; Harvie HS; Dunivan G; Schaffer J; Sung V; Varner RE; Mazloomdoost D; Barber MD;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):362.e1-362.e11. PubMed ID: 33039390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siddiqui NY; Grimes CL; Casiano ER; Abed HT; Jeppson PC; Olivera CK; Sanses TV; Steinberg AC; South MM; Balk EM; Sung VW;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 125(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25560102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ethiopian Women: What Is the Preferred Approach?
    Kenne K; Abreha M; Hart KD; Gregory WT; Nardos R
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 26(2):e7-e12. PubMed ID: 31990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The IUGA/ICS classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: a comparative experience in incontinence and prolapse surgery.
    Skala C; Renezeder K; Albrich S; Puhl A; Laterza RM; Naumann G; Koelbl H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21789657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Do we need meshes in pelvic floor reconstruction?
    Baessler K
    World J Urol; 2012 Aug; 30(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 22083097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Efficacy and safety outcomes after genital prolapse repair by the vaginal route using the Avaulta Plus® mesh.
    Oliveira J; Arfi A; Boudy AS; Bendifallah S; Daraï E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jul; 250():48-53. PubMed ID: 32387892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Comparing Force of Stream With a Standard Fill Voiding Trial After Surgical Repair of Apical Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Pilkinton ML; Williams KS; Sison CP; Shalom DF; Winkler HA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):675-682. PubMed ID: 30870290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy Using Autologous Fascia Lata Compared with Mesh.
    Bock ME; Nagle R; Soyster M; Song L; Tachibana I; Hathaway JK; Powell CR
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):801-807. PubMed ID: 33107334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Design and Early Experience With a Real-World Surgical Registry.
    Weber LeBrun EE; Lynch LD; Peterson HV; Pena SR; Ruder K; Vasilopoulos T
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):341-346. PubMed ID: 28696948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Subjective outcomes 12 years after transvaginal mesh versus native tissue repair in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse; a randomized controlled trial.
    Kluivers KB; Kamping M; Milani AL; IntHout J; Withagen MI
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jul; 34(7):1645-1651. PubMed ID: 36662272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Techniques of transvaginal mesh prolapse surgery in Japan, and the comparison of complication rates by surgeons' specialty and experience.
    Kato K; Gotoh M; Takahashi S; Kusanishi H; Takeyama M; Koyama M
    Int J Urol; 2020 Nov; 27(11):996-1000. PubMed ID: 32776359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Obturator neuropathy: an adverse outcome of a trans-obturator vaginal mesh to repair pelvic organ prolapse.
    Van Ba OL; Wagner L; de Tayrac R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jan; 25(1):145-6. PubMed ID: 23754184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Feasibility of vaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective case series.
    Renard N; Bartolo S; Giraudet G; Declas E; Rubod C; Cosson M
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101684. PubMed ID: 31926349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.
    Maher C; O'Rourke P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 117(6):1435-1436. PubMed ID: 21606756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. A prospective comparison of two commercial mesh kits in the management of anterior vaginal prolapse.
    Benjamin Feiner ; Peter O'Rourke ; Christopher Maher
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Mar; 23(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 21975472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. A Comparison of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Augmented With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Human Dermis at 12-Month Follow-up: An Ambidirectional Study.
    Seitz M; Jirschele K; Tran A; Iyer S; Gafni-Kane A; Tomezsko J; Botros SM; Sand PK
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 26(10):607-611. PubMed ID: 30335649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Reisenauer C; Andress J; Schoenfisch B; Huebner M; Brucker SY; Lippkowski A; Beilecke K; Marschke J; Tunn R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 34100975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.