These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21252770)

  • 1. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Lidegaard Ø
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 117(2 Pt 1):410-411. PubMed ID: 21252770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1018-9. PubMed ID: 20966682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiologic research using administrative databases: garbage in, garbage out.
    Hoover KW; Tao G; Kent CK; Aral SO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):729. PubMed ID: 21343778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Techniques for improving ophthalmic studies performed on administrative databases.
    Borkar DS; Sobrin L; Hubbard RA; Kempen JH; VanderBeek BL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 26(3):147-149. PubMed ID: 30521404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Garbage in, garbage out. Don't expect technology solutions to fix broken workflow processes.
    Feldbaum J
    Healthc Inform; 2006 Feb; 23(2):82. PubMed ID: 16597016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Summary Page": a novel tool that reduces omitted data in research databases.
    Goldberg SI; Niemierko A; Shubina M; Turchin A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():91. PubMed ID: 20932323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review.
    Zhan C; Miller MR
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Dec; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-63. PubMed ID: 14645897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data quality: "Garbage in - garbage out".
    Kilkenny MF; Robinson KM
    Health Inf Manag; 2018 Sep; 47(3):103-105. PubMed ID: 29719995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medico-administrative databases as research tools for joint European epidemiological studies.
    Droitcourt C
    Br J Dermatol; 2021 Nov; 185(5):879-880. PubMed ID: 34402523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can administrative data be used to compare the quality of health care?
    Romano PS
    Med Care Rev; 1993; 50(4):451-77. PubMed ID: 10131116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designing a research study.
    Smith CJ
    Phlebology; 2011 Dec; 26(8):369-70. PubMed ID: 22130807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: using HIPE data for research and audit: critical factors for success.
    O'Callaghan A; Colgan MP; McGuigan C; Smyth F; Haider N; O'Neill S; Moore D; Madhavan P
    Ir Med J; 2013 May; 106(5):157; discussion 157. PubMed ID: 23914584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fundamentals of Data Collection in Clinical Studies: Simple Steps to Avoid "Garbage In, Garbage Out".
    Derraik JGB; Parklak W; Albert BB; Boonyapranai K; Rerkasem K
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2021 Sep; 20(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 32734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Using current data in public health: from a management perspective to an economic evaluation one].
    Francisci S; Gigli A
    Epidemiol Prev; 2018; 42(2):188-189. PubMed ID: 29774721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal Audit of the Canadian Neonatal Network Data Collection System.
    Shah PS; Seidlitz W; Chan P; Yeh S; Musrap N; Lee SK;
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Oct; 34(12):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 28499309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arraying the data.
    Skjei E
    CAP Today; 2001 Mar; 15(3):60-2, 64. PubMed ID: 11317566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The current clinical database: is it complete and useful?
    Biddle G; Clark M; Jordan PS; Keen ML; Preisig P
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1993 Jan; 21(1):116-7. PubMed ID: 8418616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.
    Gavrielov-Yusim N; Friger M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Mar; 68(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 24248997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving practice: establishing processes to query clinical data warehouses.
    Brokel JM
    Urol Nurs; 2009; 29(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 19863036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missed opportunities in monitoring socioeconomic status.
    Williams DR
    Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 10822476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.