These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21252824)

  • 1. Clinical results of lumbar total disc arthroplasty in accordance with Modic signs, with a 2-year-minimum follow-up.
    Blondel B; Tropiano P; Gaudart J; Huang RC; Marnay T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2309-15. PubMed ID: 21252824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
    Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low back pain after lumbar discectomy in patients showing endplate modic type 1 change.
    Ohtori S; Yamashita M; Yamauchi K; Inoue G; Koshi T; Suzuki M; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Takaso M; Aoki Y; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Miyagi M; Kamoda H; Nakamura J; Takahashi K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):E596-600. PubMed ID: 20461034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequestrectomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: no clinical benefit after 10 years follow-up.
    Hoff E; Strube P; Gross C; Putzier M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):887-95. PubMed ID: 23232214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
    Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study.
    Chin KR; Tomlinson DT; Auerbach JD; Shatsky JB; Deirmengian CA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 18391720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative posterior lumbar muscle changes and their relationship to segmental motion preservation or restriction: a randomized prospective study.
    Strube P; Putzier M; Streitparth F; Hoff EK; Hartwig T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 26360146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Course of Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis.
    Vital JM; Gille O; Pointillart V; Pedram M; Bacon P; Razanabola F; Schaelderle C; Azzouz S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):715-20; discussion 721. PubMed ID: 12671361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 'Lumbar Fusion Outcome Score' (LUFOS): a new practical and surgically oriented grading system for preoperative prediction of surgical outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease and refractory chronic axial low back pain.
    Mattei TA; Rehman AA; Teles AR; Aldag JC; Dinh DH; McCall TD
    Neurosurg Rev; 2017 Jan; 40(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 27289367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective study on effectiveness of activ L total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results of 1- to 3-year follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Wang Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng X; Wang Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E411-7. PubMed ID: 25584945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjacent level degeneration and facet arthropathy after disc prosthesis surgery or rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: second report of a randomized study.
    Hellum C; Berg L; Gjertsen Ø; Johnsen LG; Neckelmann G; Storheim K; Keller A; Grundnes O; Espeland A;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(25):2063-73. PubMed ID: 22706091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Gornet MF; Schranck F; Wharton ND; Beall DP; Jones E; Myers ME; Hipp JA
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2127-35. PubMed ID: 24770556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.