These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253444)

  • 1. Modeling G Protein-Coupled Receptors: a Concrete Possibility.
    Costanzi S
    Chim Oggi; 2010; 28(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 21253444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?
    Mobarec JC; Sanchez R; Filizola M
    J Med Chem; 2009 Aug; 52(16):5207-16. PubMed ID: 19627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region.
    Topiol S; Sabio M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19447219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rhodopsin and the others: a historical perspective on structural studies of G protein-coupled receptors.
    Costanzi S; Siegel J; Tikhonova IG; Jacobson KA
    Curr Pharm Des; 2009; 15(35):3994-4002. PubMed ID: 20028316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homology modeling of class a G protein-coupled receptors.
    Costanzi S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():259-79. PubMed ID: 22323225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Community-wide assessment of GPCR structure modelling and ligand docking: GPCR Dock 2008.
    Michino M; Abola E; ; Brooks CL; Dixon JS; Moult J; Stevens RC
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2009 Jun; 8(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 19461661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies for improved modeling of GPCR-drug complexes: blind predictions of serotonin receptors bound to ergotamine.
    Rodríguez D; Ranganathan A; Carlsson J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2004-21. PubMed ID: 25030302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adenosine receptor modeling: what does the A2A crystal structure tell us?
    Dal Ben D; Lambertucci C; Marucci G; Volpini R; Cristalli G
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(10):993-1018. PubMed ID: 20370656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models.
    Worth CL; Kleinau G; Krause G
    PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e7011. PubMed ID: 19756152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure-based identification of binding sites, native ligands and potential inhibitors for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Cavasotto CN; Orry AJ; Abagyan RA
    Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):423-33. PubMed ID: 12696053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevance of rhodopsin studies for GPCR activation.
    Deupi X
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1837(5):674-82. PubMed ID: 24041646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GPCR-SSFE: a comprehensive database of G-protein-coupled receptor template predictions and homology models.
    Worth CL; Kreuchwig A; Kleinau G; Krause G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():185. PubMed ID: 21605354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
    Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.