These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253718)

  • 21. [Radiation exposure of the patient exemplified by lateral cranial image in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the film-screen system].
    Seifert H; Kubale R; Blass G; Kunz G; Wagner P; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Oct; 48(10):298-303. PubMed ID: 7502166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
    Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A digital radiographic device for medical diagnosis].
    Babichev EA; Baru SE; Volobuev AI; Gusev VV; Kolachev GM; Nemkov IuA; Neustroev VA; Nekhanevich EL; Porosev VV; Savinov GA; Sidorov VA; Ukraintsev IuG; Khabakhpashev AG; Shekhtman LI; Iurchenko IuB
    Med Tekh; 1997; (1):13-7. PubMed ID: 9148066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Preface for special issue on image quality and dose in digital era].
    Sakamoto H; Ichikawa K; Kishimoto T; Funahashi M; Muramatsu S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1379-80. PubMed ID: 22104229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Digital mammography].
    Otsuka K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 12881672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
    Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Doses measured using AEC on direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-rays systems: updated results with an RP 162 perspective.
    Bowden L; Faulkner R; Gallagher A; O'Connor U; Walsh C; Dowling A; O'Reilly G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 23175645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.
    Strauss KJ; Kaste SC
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):110-2. PubMed ID: 16862422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image gently: using exposure indicators to improve pediatric digital radiography.
    Moore QT; Don S; Goske MJ; Strauss KJ; Cohen M; Herrmann T; Macdougall R; Noble L; Morrison G; John SD; Lehman L
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 84(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 22988269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of digital technologies to decrease the radiation exposure from X-ray diagnostics to the population of Ukraine.
    Kovalenko Y; Miroshnychenko S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):98-9. PubMed ID: 20223851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Dosimetric characteristics of a slotted digital x-ray unit as a device with reduced radiation exposure].
    Stavitskiĭ RV; Mishkinis BIa; Volobuev AI; Denisov PI; Lapina TV
    Med Tekh; 1989; (2):23-6. PubMed ID: 2747495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Dose classification in digital roentgen diagnosis: clinical applications].
    Hojreh A; Kainberger F; Nowotny R; Czerny Ch; Imhof H
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):48-50. PubMed ID: 12621841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Determination of the dynamic range of digital X-ray receivers].
    Veĭp IuA
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):8-10. PubMed ID: 16285238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practical application of suspension criteria scenarios in general radiography, computed radiography,digital radiography and fluoroscopy.
    O'Connor U; Gallagher A; O'Reilly G; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation protection in newer imaging technologies.
    Rehani MM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):357-62. PubMed ID: 20142278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.