386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253926)
1. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface Grafting of Reverse Osmosis Membrane with Chlorhexidine Using Biopolymer Alginate Dialdehyde as a Facile Green Platform for In Situ Biofouling Control.
Khan R; Wang H; Li Y; Yu S; Khan MK; Xiao K; Huang X
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Aug; 12(33):37515-37526. PubMed ID: 32701290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitigating biofouling with a vanillin coating on thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes.
Shin H; Park C; Lee CK; Lee YS; Kim JO
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 31755056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functionalization of reverse osmosis membrane with graphene oxide and polyacrylic acid to control biofouling and mineral scaling.
Ashfaq MY; Al-Ghouti MA; Zouari N
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 736():139500. PubMed ID: 32479964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four release tests exhibit variable silver stability from nanoparticle-modified reverse osmosis membranes.
Bi Y; Han B; Zimmerman S; Perreault F; Sinha S; Westerhoff P
Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():77-86. PubMed ID: 29940364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grafted Polymer Coatings Enhance Fouling Inhibition by an Antimicrobial Peptide on Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
Shtreimer Kandiyote N; Avisdris T; Arnusch CJ; Kasher R
Langmuir; 2019 Feb; 35(5):1935-1943. PubMed ID: 30576152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recycling of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes for membrane biofilms reactors (MBfRs). Effect of chlorination on the membrane surface and gas permeability.
Morón-López J; Nieto-Reyes L; Aguado S; El-Shehawy R; Molina S
Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 231():103-112. PubMed ID: 31128344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multispecies biofilms on reverse osmosis membrane dictate the function and characteristics of the bacterial communities rather than their structure.
Ran N; Sorek G; Stein N; Sharon-Gojman R; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 231(Pt 1):115999. PubMed ID: 37105294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring biofouling based on aerobic respiration in reverse osmosis system.
Yu Y; Park KY; Jung J; Song W; Kim J; Ryu J; Lade H; Kweon J
J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Apr; 78():247-256. PubMed ID: 30665643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibition of biofouling on reverse osmosis membrane surfaces by germicidal ultraviolet light side-emitting optical fibers.
Rho H; Yu P; Zhao Z; Lee CS; Chon K; Perreault F; Alvarez PJJ; Amy G; Westerhoff P
Water Res; 2022 Oct; 224():119094. PubMed ID: 36115159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Surface Roughness Necessarily Increase the Fouling Propensity of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Humic Acid?
Gan Q; Wu C; Long L; Peng LE; Yang Z; Guo H; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(6):2548-2556. PubMed ID: 36719958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the hybrid system combining electrocoagulation, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for biologically treated textile effluent: Treatment efficiency and membrane fouling.
Güneş E; Gönder ZB
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113042. PubMed ID: 34126531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple reaction-diffusion model for initial stages of biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes.
Rashkeev SN; Shomar B
Environ Res; 2020 Nov; 190():110000. PubMed ID: 32771368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow-through electrode system (FES): An effective approach for biofouling control of reverse osmosis membranes for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wang HB; Wu YH; Sun YG; Xu YQ; Chen Z; Xue S; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Koji N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2024 Feb; 249():120890. PubMed ID: 38016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal Characteristics of N-Nitrosamines and Their Precursors by Pilot-Scale Integrated Membrane Systems for Water Reuse.
Takeuchi H; Yamashita N; Nakada N; Tanaka H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled TiO
Zhou X; Zhao YY; Kim SR; Elimelech M; Hu S; Kim JH
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(24):14311-14320. PubMed ID: 30516046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
