885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253926)
21. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
Kang GD; Cao YM
Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Hinrichs C; Van der Meer WG; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Biofouling; 2009; 25(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 19437193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes.
Myint AA; Lee W; Mun S; Ahn CH; Lee S; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2010; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 20087803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes.
Ying W; Kumar R; Herzberg M; Kasher R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6815-22. PubMed ID: 25920584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of surfactants influencing attachment of a Mycobacterium sp. to cellulose acetate and aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes.
Campbell P; Srinivasan R; Knoell T; Phipps D; Ishida K; Safarik J; Cormack T; Ridgway H
Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Sep; 64(5):527-44. PubMed ID: 10404233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of biofouling on pharmaceuticals rejection in NF membrane filtration.
Botton S; Verliefde AR; Quach NT; Cornelissen ER
Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5848-60. PubMed ID: 22960036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does chlorination of seawater reverse osmosis membranes control biofouling?
Khan MT; Hong PY; Nada N; Croue JP
Water Res; 2015 Jul; 78():84-97. PubMed ID: 25917390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hybrid organic/inorganic reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for bactericidal anti-fouling. 1. Preparation and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane.
Kwak SY; Kim SH; Kim SS
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jun; 35(11):2388-94. PubMed ID: 11414050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance.
Lind ML; Eumine Suk D; Nguyen TV; Hoek EM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(21):8230-5. PubMed ID: 20942398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surface Grafting of Reverse Osmosis Membrane with Chlorhexidine Using Biopolymer Alginate Dialdehyde as a Facile Green Platform for In Situ Biofouling Control.
Khan R; Wang H; Li Y; Yu S; Khan MK; Xiao K; Huang X
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Aug; 12(33):37515-37526. PubMed ID: 32701290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system.
Hu JY; Song LF; Ong SL; Phua ET; Ng WJ
Chemosphere; 2005 Mar; 59(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15698653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the effect of surface modification of polyamide RO membrane by l-DOPA on the short range physiochemical interactions with biopolymer fouling on the membrane.
Azari S; Zou L; Cornelissen E
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2014 Aug; 120():222-8. PubMed ID: 24916284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of the biofouling and cleaning efficiency of nanofiltration membranes.
Houari A; Seyer D; Couquard F; Kecili K; Democrate C; Heim V; Di Martino P
Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20390552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Swelling and morphology of the skin layer of polyamide composite membranes: an atomic force microscopy study.
Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jun; 38(11):3168-75. PubMed ID: 15224751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of membrane fouling for in-line filtration of oil sands process-affected water: the effects of pretreatment conditions.
Kim ES; Liu Y; Gamal El-Din M
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2877-84. PubMed ID: 22279959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bacterial attachment to RO membranes surface-modified by concentration-polarization-enhanced graft polymerization.
Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):5973-80. PubMed ID: 21682251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rapid novel test for the determination of biofouling potential on reverse osmosis membranes.
Manalo CV; Ohno M; Okuda T; Nakai S; Nishijima W
Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(12):2978-85. PubMed ID: 27332844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
