880 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253926)
41. In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling mitigation.
Ben-Sasson M; Lu X; Bar-Zeev E; Zodrow KR; Nejati S; Qi G; Giannelis EP; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 62():260-70. PubMed ID: 24963888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Systematic analysis of micromixers to minimize biofouling on reverse osmosis membranes.
Altman SJ; McGrath LK; Jones HD; Sanchez A; Noek R; Clem P; Cook A; Ho CK
Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(12):3545-54. PubMed ID: 20493509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux.
Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
Bellona C; Drewes JE
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biofilm formation characteristics of bacterial isolates retrieved from a reverse osmosis membrane.
Pang CM; Hong P; Guo H; Liu WT
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Oct; 39(19):7541-50. PubMed ID: 16245826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Structure-motion-performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films.
Kwak SY; Jung SG; Kim SH
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Nov; 35(21):4334-40. PubMed ID: 11718351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration.
Heffernan R; Habimana O; Semião AJ; Cao H; Safari A; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():118-28. PubMed ID: 25265304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
Wang YN; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Scale formation in NF/RO: mechanism and control.
Lee S; Lee CH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):267-75. PubMed ID: 16003986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A novel scenario for biofouling control of spiral wound membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3890-8. PubMed ID: 21592541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Degradation of polyamide nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes by hypochlorite.
Do VT; Tang CY; Reinhard M; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):852-9. PubMed ID: 22221176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
Li ZY; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Valladares-Linares R; Li Q; Zhan T; Amy G
Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 22094000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Permeability and selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes: correlation to swelling revisited.
Dražević E; Košutić K; Freger V
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():444-52. PubMed ID: 24216230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
