885 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21253926)
61. Validation of 3D simulations of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling.
Pintelon TR; Creber SA; von der Schulenburg DA; Johns ML
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Jul; 106(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 20205206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Mitigating biofouling with a vanillin coating on thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes.
Shin H; Park C; Lee CK; Lee YS; Kim JO
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 31755056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Buiter J; Riviere M; van der Meer WG; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):689-702. PubMed ID: 19836048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms.
Mi B; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):2022-8. PubMed ID: 20151636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Yuan B; Wang Z; Li X; Ren Y
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Feb; 202():50-8. PubMed ID: 26700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Functionalization of reverse osmosis membrane with graphene oxide and polyacrylic acid to control biofouling and mineral scaling.
Ashfaq MY; Al-Ghouti MA; Zouari N
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Sep; 736():139500. PubMed ID: 32479964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. In situ surface chemical modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for enhanced organic fouling resistance.
Lu X; Romero-Vargas Castrillón S; Shaffer DL; Ma J; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(21):12219-28. PubMed ID: 24066902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Influence of surface properties of RO membrane on membrane fouling for treating textile secondary effluent.
Yin Z; Yang C; Long C; Li A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jul; 24(19):16253-16262. PubMed ID: 28540548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Efficient wastewater treatment by membranes through constructing tunable antifouling membrane surfaces.
Chen W; Su Y; Peng J; Zhao X; Jiang Z; Dong Y; Zhang Y; Liang Y; Liu J
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6545-52. PubMed ID: 21711041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Four release tests exhibit variable silver stability from nanoparticle-modified reverse osmosis membranes.
Bi Y; Han B; Zimmerman S; Perreault F; Sinha S; Westerhoff P
Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():77-86. PubMed ID: 29940364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Grafted Polymer Coatings Enhance Fouling Inhibition by an Antimicrobial Peptide on Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
Shtreimer Kandiyote N; Avisdris T; Arnusch CJ; Kasher R
Langmuir; 2019 Feb; 35(5):1935-1943. PubMed ID: 30576152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effect of anionic fluidized ion exchange (FIX) pre-treatment on nanofiltration (NF) membrane fouling.
Cornelissen ER; Chasseriaud D; Siegers WG; Beerendonk EF; van der Kooij D
Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3283-93. PubMed ID: 20381111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Recycling of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes for membrane biofilms reactors (MBfRs). Effect of chlorination on the membrane surface and gas permeability.
Morón-López J; Nieto-Reyes L; Aguado S; El-Shehawy R; Molina S
Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 231():103-112. PubMed ID: 31128344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effects of biofilm formation on membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors.
Mafirad S; Mehrnia MR; Azami H; Sarrafzadeh MH
Biofouling; 2011 May; 27(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 21604217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Adsorption combined with ultrafiltration to remove organic matter from seawater.
Tansakul C; Laborie S; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6362-70. PubMed ID: 21996607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A new concept in polymeric thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes with antibacterial properties.
Mollahosseini A; Rahimpour A
Biofouling; 2013; 29(5):537-48. PubMed ID: 23682668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
