These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21254922)

  • 1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without a ureteral stent.
    Sethi AS; Regan SM; Sundaram CP
    J Endourol; 2011 Feb; 25(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 21254922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
    Hopf HL; Bahler CD; Sundaram CP
    Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():106-10. PubMed ID: 26801810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent.
    Kočvara R; Sedláček J; Drlík M; Dítě Z; Běláček J; Fiala V
    J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Dec; 10(6):1153-9. PubMed ID: 24957464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
    Patel V
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
    Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
    J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Chu DI; Shrivastava D; Van Batavia JP; Bowen DK; Tong CC; Long CJ; Weiss DA; Shukla AR; Srinivasan AK
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):450.e1-450.e6. PubMed ID: 29776869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.
    Danuser H; Germann C; Pelzer N; Rühle A; Stucki P; Mattei A
    BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Outcomes of Double-J and Cutaneous Pyeloureteral Stents in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.
    Lombardo A; Toni T; Andolfi C; Gundeti MS
    J Endourol; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1616-1622. PubMed ID: 34074116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
    Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Yucel S; Samuelson ML; Nguyen MT; Baker LA
    J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):720-5; discussion 725. PubMed ID: 17222666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
    Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
    Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform.
    Cestari A; Buffi NM; Lista G; Lughezzani G; Larcher A; Lazzeri M; Sangalli M; Rigatti P; Guazzoni G
    Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 22469392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation.
    Patil NN; Mottrie A; Sundaram B; Patel VR
    Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):47-50; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 18384858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
    Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy.
    Korets R; Hyams ES; Shah OD; Stifelman MD
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):366-9. PubMed ID: 17826511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.