These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent. Kočvara R; Sedláček J; Drlík M; Dítě Z; Běláček J; Fiala V J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Dec; 10(6):1153-9. PubMed ID: 24957464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Chu DI; Shrivastava D; Van Batavia JP; Bowen DK; Tong CC; Long CJ; Weiss DA; Shukla AR; Srinivasan AK J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):450.e1-450.e6. PubMed ID: 29776869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study. Danuser H; Germann C; Pelzer N; Rühle A; Stucki P; Mattei A BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]