These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21255123)

  • 1. What subcortical-cortical relationships tell us about processing speech in noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Marmel F; Bair J; Kraus N
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 33(3):549-57. PubMed ID: 21255123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of broadband noise on cortical evoked auditory responses at different loudness levels in young adults.
    Sharma M; Purdy SC; Munro KJ; Sawaya K; Peter V
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 24323122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Varying effect of noise on sound onset and acoustic change evoked auditory cortical N1 responses evoked by a vowel-vowel stimulus.
    Yaralı M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():36-43. PubMed ID: 32302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of background noise on inter-trial phase coherence and auditory N1-P2 responses to speech stimuli.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():113-9. PubMed ID: 26276419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Speech-specific cortical potentials--methodologic aspects and initial clinical results].
    Rosanowski F; Hoppe U; Moser M; Tigges M; Eysholdt U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jun; 75(6):326-9. PubMed ID: 8766377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in sensory evoked responses coincide with rapid improvement in speech identification performance.
    Alain C; Campeanu S; Tremblay K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 22(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 19485700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity.
    Kozou H; Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Toppila E; Starck J; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):31-9. PubMed ID: 15574298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally presented speech stimuli: an auditory evoked potentials study.
    Ahadi M; Pourbakht A; Jafari AH; Shirjian Z; Jafarpisheh AS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Jun; 41(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 24183398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults.
    Akhoun I; Gallégo S; Moulin A; Ménard M; Veuillet E; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):922-33. PubMed ID: 18291717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.