These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21256516)

  • 1. Re: Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. A. J. Stephenson, D. P. Wood, M. W. Kattan, E. A. Klein, P. T. Scardino, J. A. Eastham and B. S. Carver j urol 2009; 182: 1357-1363.
    Calışkan S; Kaya C
    J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):1155. PubMed ID: 21256516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories: E. A. Klein, F. J. Bianco, A. M. Serio, J. A. Eastham, M. W. Kattan, J. E. Pontes, A. J. Vickers and P. T. Scardino J Urol 2008; 179: 2212-2217.
    Sivanandam A; Bhandari M
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2716-7; author reply 2717-8. PubMed ID: 18951589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Stephenson AJ; Wood DP; Kattan MW; Klein EA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA; Carver BS
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1357-63. PubMed ID: 19683274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: C. Von Bodman, G. Godoy, D. C. Chade, A. Cronin, L. J. Tafe, S. W. Fine, V. Laudone, P. T. Scardino and J. A. Eastham J Urol 2010; 184: 143-148.
    Cai T; Nesi G; Malossini G; Bartoletti R
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):360-1; author reply 361. PubMed ID: 21092995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes: W. T. Lowrance, E. B. Elkin, L. M. Jacks, D. S. Yee, T. L. Jang, V. P. Laudone, B. D. Guillonneau, P. T. Scardino and J. A. Eastham J Urol 2010; 183: 1366-1372.
    See WA
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1573-4; author reply 1574. PubMed ID: 20732691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: J. A. Smith, Jr., R. C. Chan, S. S. Chang, S. D. Herrell, P. E. Clark, R. Baumgartner and M. S. Cookson. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390.
    Masieri L; Minervini A; Serni S; Carini M
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2257; author reply 2257. PubMed ID: 18823916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely at radical prostatectomy? Decision curve analysis of European Society of Urologic Oncology criteria F. P. Secin, F. J. Bianco, A. Cronin, J. A. Eastham, P. T. Scardino, B. Guillonneau and A. J. Vickers J Urol 2009; 181: 609-614.
    Bellina M; Ambu A; Mari M
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1233. PubMed ID: 19625054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
    Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Miller DP; Yu J; Flanders SC; Henning JM; Stier DM; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. A. Smith, Jr., R. C. Chan, S. S. Chang, S. D. Herrell, P. E. Clark, R. Baumgartner and M. S. Cookson. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-2390.
    Canes D
    J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):410-1; author reply 411. PubMed ID: 18499156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Saad F; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):601-7; discussion 607-8. PubMed ID: 19084864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate biopsy tumor extent but not location predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE.
    Greene KL; Elkin EP; Karapetian A; Duchane J; Carroll PR; Kane CJ;
    J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):125-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 16406887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Can nomograms derived in the U.S. applied to German patients? A study about the validation of preoperative nomograms predicting the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy].
    Graefen M; Augustin H; Karakiewicz PI; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Cagiannos I; Scardino PT; Kattan MW; Huland H
    Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):685-92. PubMed ID: 12750804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location and number of positive surgical margins as prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence after salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy.
    Bastide C; Savage C; Cronin A; Zelefsky MJ; Eastham JA; Touijer K; Scardino PT; Guillonneau BD
    BJU Int; 2010 Nov; 106(10):1454-7. PubMed ID: 20482705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The usefulness of touch preparation cytological evaluation and prostatic capsule involvement in prediction of prostate cancer recurrence.
    Brannigan RE; Shin E; Rademaker A; Oyasu R; Huang CF; Pearle MS; McVary KT
    J Urol; 1998 Nov; 160(5):1741-7. PubMed ID: 9783944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
    Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. S. E. Eggener, A. Mueller, R. K. Berglund, R. Ayyathurai, C. Soloway, M. S. Soloway, R. Abouassaly, E. A. Klein, S. J. Jones, C. Zappavigna, L. Goldenberg, P. T. Scardino, J. A. Eastham and B. Guillonneau J Urol 2009; 181: 1635-1641.
    Ayres BE; Bott SR; Barber NJ; Langley SE; Montgomery BS
    J Urol; 2010 Sep; 184(3):1223-4; author reply 1224. PubMed ID: 20655069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.