220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21256629)
1. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related bloodstream infections.
Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
Am J Infect Control; 2011 May; 39(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 21256629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of needleless connectors on catheter-related thrombotic occlusions.
Btaiche IF; Kovacevich DS; Khalidi N; Papke LF
J Infus Nurs; 2011; 34(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 21399454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 16418982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preventing central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development of an antiseptic barrier cap for needleless connectors.
Menyhay SZ; Maki DG
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S174.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19084153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care-associated bloodstream infections associated with negative- or positive-pressure or displacement mechanical valve needleless connectors.
Jarvis WR; Murphy C; Hall KK; Fogle PJ; Karchmer TB; Harrington G; Salgado C; Giannetta ET; Cameron C; Sherertz RJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2009 Dec; 49(12):1821-7. PubMed ID: 19911973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outbreak of bloodstream infection temporally associated with the use of an intravascular needleless valve.
Rupp ME; Sholtz LA; Jourdan DR; Marion ND; Tyner LK; Fey PD; Iwen PC; Anderson JR
Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 44(11):1408-14. PubMed ID: 17479934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fall in bloodstream infections followed a change to 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropanol for catheter connection antisepsis: a pediatric single center before/after study on a hemopoietic stem cell transplant ward.
Soothill JS; Bravery K; Ho A; Macqueen S; Collins J; Lock P
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Oct; 37(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19616869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of needle-free connectors compared with 3-way stopcocks on catheter-related bloodstream infection rates: A meta-analysis.
Rosenthal VD
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Mar; 48(3):281-284. PubMed ID: 31551122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of chlorhexidine washcloths on healthcare-associated infections: do the recent trials add to the evidence?
Karki S; Cheng AC
J Hosp Infect; 2013 Jul; 84(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 23747100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical use of disinfectable needle-free connectors.
Yébenes JC; Serra-Prat M
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):S175.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19084154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of alcohol-impregnated port protectors and needleless neutral pressure connectors on central line-associated bloodstream infections and contamination of blood cultures in an inpatient oncology unit.
Sweet MA; Cumpston A; Briggs F; Craig M; Hamadani M
Am J Infect Control; 2012 Dec; 40(10):931-4. PubMed ID: 22575286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Needleless connectors for IV catheters.
Hadaway L
Am J Nurs; 2012 Nov; 112(11):32-44; quiz 45. PubMed ID: 23075549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of the vascular catheter: can it minimise the risk of infection?
Bouza E; Guembe M; Muñoz P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2010 Dec; 36 Suppl 2():S22-5. PubMed ID: 21130605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of disinfection protocols used for needleless connectors of central venous catheters.
Mazher MA; Kallen A; Edwards JR; Donlan RM
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 57(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 23710651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microbiological comparison of a silver-coated and a non-coated needleless intravascular connector in clinical use.
Casey AL; Karpanen TJ; Nightingale P; Cook M; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Apr; 80(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 22341495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keeping needleless connectors clean, part 1.
Moureau NL; Dawson RB
Nursing; 2010 May; 40(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 20386391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adequate disinfection of a split-septum needleless intravascular connector with a 5-second alcohol scrub.
Rupp ME; Yu S; Huerta T; Cavalieri RJ; Alter R; Fey PD; Van Schooneveld T; Anderson JR
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 33(7):661-5. PubMed ID: 22669226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Connectors as a risk factor for blood-associated infections (3-way stopcock and needleless connector): A randomized-experimental study.
Sengul T; Guven B; Ocakci AF; Kaya N
Am J Infect Control; 2020 Mar; 48(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 31604623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of central line-associated bloodstream infection rates when changing to a zero fluid displacement intravenous needleless connector in acute care settings.
Chernecky CC; Macklin D; Jarvis WR; Joshua TV
Am J Infect Control; 2014 Feb; 42(2):200-2. PubMed ID: 23973422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
