346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21256640)
41. Detecting direct inferior alveolar nerve - Third molar contact and canal decorticalization by cone-beam computed tomography to predict postoperative sensory impairment.
Bozkurt P; Görürgöz C
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):259-263. PubMed ID: 31325623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Location and dimensions of the mental foramen: a radiographic analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography.
von Arx T; Friedli M; Sendi P; Lozanoff S; Bornstein MM
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1522-8. PubMed ID: 24238440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of the mandibular third molar--a comparative study of preoperative images by panoramic radiography and computed tomography.
Hasegawa T; Ri S; Shigeta T; Akashi M; Imai Y; Kakei Y; Shibuya Y; Komori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 42(7):843-51. PubMed ID: 23499150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
Katakam SK; Shankar U; Thakur D; Reddy TP; Hari KR; Janga D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 23404009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
Quirino de Almeida Barros R; Bezerra de Melo N; de Macedo Bernardino Í; Arêa Leão Lopes Araújo Arruda MJ; Meira Bento P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 56(10):952-955. PubMed ID: 30448357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of location and dimensions of lingual foramina using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
von Arx T; Matter D; Buser D; Bornstein MM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2777-85. PubMed ID: 21855197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars.
Kaeppler G
Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11203906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction.
Maegawa H; Sano K; Kitagawa Y; Ogasawara T; Miyauchi K; Sekine J; Inokuchi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 14600702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Investigation of the relationship between the mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve using posteroanterior radiographs: a pilot study.
Apaydın BK; Icoz D; Uzun E; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):371. PubMed ID: 38519914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Virtual technologies in dentoalveolar evaluation and surgery.
Friedland B; Donoff B; Chenin D
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2012 Mar; 20(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 22365429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of anatomical relationships in the mandibular third molar region based on its angulation and depth of impaction: a CBCT-based study.
Vasegh Z; Bakhshaei P; Jahanbani M; Mahmoudi Anzabi R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):613-622. PubMed ID: 37620734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [A PhD completed. Pre-surgical assessment of the mandibular body and canal using CBCT imaging.].
Gerlach NL
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2018 Jun; 125(6):341-344. PubMed ID: 29928754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
Tantanapornkul W; Okouchi K; Fujiwara Y; Yamashiro M; Maruoka Y; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography.
Ohman A; Kivijärvi K; Blombäck U; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 16421261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Artificial intelligence in positioning between mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar nerve on panoramic radiography.
Choi E; Lee S; Jeong E; Shin S; Park H; Youm S; Son Y; Pang K
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2456. PubMed ID: 35165342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. External validation of cone-beam computed tomography- and panoramic radiography-featured prediction models for inferior alveolar nerve injury after lower third molar removal: proposal of a risk calculator.
Kubota S; Imai T; Nishimoto A; Amekawa S; Uzawa N
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):178-191. PubMed ID: 35604499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
