BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21257089)

  • 1. Acoustic radiation contrast in MR images for breast cancer diagnostics--initial phantom study.
    Radicke M; Mende J; Kofahl AL; Wild J; Ulucay D; Habenstein B; Deimling M; Trautner P; Weber B; Maier K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 21257089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic radiation force contrast in MRI: detection of calcifications in tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Mende J; Wild J; Ulucay D; Radicke M; Kofahl AL; Weber B; Krieg R; Maier K
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6347-56. PubMed ID: 21302792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging.
    McDannold N; Maier SE
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3748-58. PubMed ID: 18777934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography.
    Sinkus R; Tanter M; Xydeas T; Catheline S; Bercoff J; Fink M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 15833607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of novel imaging probe for optical/acoustic radiation imaging (OARI).
    Ejofodomi OA; Zderic V; Zara JM
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111910. PubMed ID: 24320443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tissue-mimicking bladder wall phantoms for evaluating acoustic radiation force-optical coherence elastography systems.
    Ejofodomi OA; Zderic V; Zara JM
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1440-8. PubMed ID: 20443465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method of imaging viscoelastic parameters with acoustic radiation force.
    Walker WF; Fernandez FJ; Negron LA
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jun; 45(6):1437-47. PubMed ID: 10870702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing acoustic attenuation of homogeneous media using focused impulsive acoustic radiation force.
    Palmeri ML; Frinkley KD; Oldenburg KG; Nightingale KR
    Ultrason Imaging; 2006 Apr; 28(2):114-28. PubMed ID: 17094691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving in situ acoustic intensity estimates using MR acoustic radiation force imaging in combination with multifrequency MR elastography.
    Li N; Gaur P; Quah K; Butts Pauly K
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1673-1689. PubMed ID: 35762849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion of a solid sphere in a viscoelastic medium in response to applied acoustic radiation force: Theoretical analysis and experimental verification.
    Aglyamov SR; Karpiouk AB; Ilinskii YA; Zabolotskaya EA; Emelianov SY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):1927-36. PubMed ID: 17902829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of viscosity on the shear strain remotely induced by focused ultrasound in viscoelastic media.
    Barannik EA; Girnyk SA; Tovstiak VV; Marusenko AI; Volokhov VA; Sarvazyan AP; Emelianov SY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2358-64. PubMed ID: 15139649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force.
    Nightingale K; Palmeri M; Trahey G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 32(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16364798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulation technique for 3D MR-guided acoustic radiation force imaging.
    Payne A; de Bever J; Farrer A; Coats B; Parker DL; Christensen DA
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):674-84. PubMed ID: 25652481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The estimation of elasticity and viscosity of soft tissues in vitro using the data of remote acoustic palpation.
    Girnyk S; Barannik A; Barannik E; Tovstiak V; Marusenko A; Volokhov V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 16464667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and characterization of a tissue mimicking psyllium husk gelatin phantom for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hofstetter LW; Fausett L; Mueller A; Odéen H; Payne A; Christensen DA; Parker DL
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2020; 37(1):283-290. PubMed ID: 32204632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
    Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D conformal MRI-controlled transurethral ultrasound prostate therapy: validation of numerical simulations and demonstration in tissue-mimicking gel phantoms.
    Burtnyk M; N'Djin WA; Kobelevskiy I; Bronskill M; Chopra R
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6817-39. PubMed ID: 21030751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection.
    Sinkus R; Lorenzen J; Schrader D; Lorenzen M; Dargatz M; Holz D
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jun; 45(6):1649-64. PubMed ID: 10870716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation force imaging of viscoelastic properties with reduced artifacts.
    Viola F; Walker WF
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Jun; 50(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 12839188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility.
    Nightingale K; Soo MS; Nightingale R; Trahey G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 28(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 11937286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.