These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21257135)

  • 1. Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: the state of the art and future possibilities.
    Schultz AE; Kuiken TA
    PM R; 2011 Jan; 3(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 21257135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm.
    Dhillon GS; Horch KW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 16425828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs.
    Dhillon GS; Lawrence SM; Hutchinson DT; Horch KW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):605-15; discussion 616-8. PubMed ID: 15249083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tests of hand functionality in upper limb amputation with prosthesis].
    Bazzini G; Orlandini D; Moscato TA; Nicita D; Panigazzi M
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 17886763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Update on advances in upper extremity prosthetics.
    Behrend C; Reizner W; Marchessault JA; Hammert WC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 36(10):1711-7. PubMed ID: 21971060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
    Resnik L; Meucci MR; Lieberman-Klinger S; Fantini C; Kelty DL; Disla R; Sasson N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 22464092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics.
    Antfolk C; D'Alonzo M; Rosén B; Lundborg G; Sebelius F; Cipriani C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Jan; 10(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 23278223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisession, noninvasive closed-loop neuroprosthetic control of grasping by upper limb amputees.
    Agashe HA; Paek AY; Contreras-Vidal JL
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 228():107-28. PubMed ID: 27590967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses.
    Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dielectric elastomers as actuators for upper limb prosthetics: challenges and opportunities.
    Biddiss E; Chau T
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 May; 30(4):403-18. PubMed ID: 17632030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.
    Biddiss EA; Chau TT
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):236-57. PubMed ID: 17979010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuroelectric source imaging of steady-state movement-related cortical potentials in human upper extremity amputees with and without phantom limb pain.
    Karl A; Mühlnickel W; Kurth R; Flor H
    Pain; 2004 Jul; 110(1-2):90-102. PubMed ID: 15275756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body schema and body awareness of amputees.
    Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vibrotactile detection thresholds for chest skin of amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery.
    Schultz AE; Marasco PD; Kuiken TA
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():121-9. PubMed ID: 19059226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Exoprosthetic Replacement of the Upper Extremity].
    Salminger S; Mayer JA; Sturma A; Riedl O; Bergmeister KD; Aszmann OC
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):411-24. PubMed ID: 27547980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The artificial substitution of missing hands with myoelectrical prostheses.
    Näder M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Sep; (258):9-17. PubMed ID: 2203576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.
    Glynn MK; Galway HR; Hunter G; Sauter WF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Aug; (209):202-5. PubMed ID: 3731596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.