These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21257228)

  • 1. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].
    El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))].
    Loudot C; Zanin E; Fogliarini C; Boulze M; Souchon L; Denis D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Jun; 34(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 21550131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements.
    Holzer MP; Mamusa M; Auffarth GU
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 93(6):807-10. PubMed ID: 19289385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.
    Bjeloš Rončević M; Bušić M; Cima I; Kuzmanović Elabjer B; Bosnar D; Miletić D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 249(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 20853004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin.
    Ortiz A; Galvis V; Tello A; Viaña V; Corrales MI; Ochoa M; Rodriguez CJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1809-1818. PubMed ID: 30136018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
    Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population.
    Gursoy H; Sahin A; Basmak H; Ozer A; Yildirim N; Colak E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):912-9. PubMed ID: 21552178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.