618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21257258)
1. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement.
Godoy G; Chong KT; Cronin A; Vickers A; Laudone V; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Coleman JA
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21257258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.
Briganti A; Larcher A; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Gallina A; Suardi N; Bianchi M; Sun M; Freschi M; Salonia A; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 22078338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Walz J; Bladou F; Rousseau B; Laroche J; Salem N; Gravis G; Briganti A; Chun FK; Karakiewicz PI; Fournier G
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22386393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.
Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Zaffuto E; Bandini M; Dell'Oglio P; Bravi CA; Fallara G; Pellegrino F; Nocera L; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Freschi M; Montironi R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):632-640. PubMed ID: 28412062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of the updated Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended lymph node dissection.
Hansen J; Rink M; Bianchi M; Kluth LA; Tian Z; Ahyai SA; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Steuber T; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Chun FK
Prostate; 2013 Jan; 73(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 22821742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A nomogram is more accurate than a regression tree in predicting lymph node invasion in prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Chun FK; Walz J; Heuer R; Salonia A; Haese A; Perrotte P; Valiquette L; Graefen M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 18005204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Roumiguié M; Robesti D; Dell'Oglio P; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 30342844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of nomograms predicting lymph node involvement in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Hinev AI; Anakievski D; Kolev NH; Hadjiev VI
Urol Int; 2014; 92(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24480972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy using the European Association of Urology guideline nomogram: a validation study.
Schmitges J; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Abdollah F; Budäus L; Isbarn H; Bianchi M; Trinh QD; Schlomm T; Chun FK; Graefen M; Steuber T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 38(7):624-9. PubMed ID: 22531769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance lymphography findings in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy and the relation with the Stephenson nomogram.
Meijer HJ; Debats OA; Roach M; Span PN; Witjes JA; Kaanders JH; van Lin EN; Barentsz JO
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Dec; 84(5):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22520482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Zanni G; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2006 Jun; 49(6):1019-26; discussion 1026-7. PubMed ID: 16530933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percentage of positive biopsy cores can improve the ability to predict lymph node invasion in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Chun FK; Gallina A; Salonia A; Zanni G; Valiquette L; Graefen M; Huland H; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1573-81. PubMed ID: 17293026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radioisotope Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection.
Winter A; Kneib T; Rohde M; Henke RP; Wawroschek F
Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 26159232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gontero P; Abdollah F; Passoni NM; Tombal B; Marchioro G; Kneitz B; Walz J; Frohneberg D; Bangma CH; Graefen M; Tizzani A; Frea B; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 22153925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection.
Katz DJ; Yee DS; Godoy G; Nogueira L; Chong KT; Coleman JA
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 20089113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
