572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21258271)
21. Dynamic effects of axial loading on the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected spinal stenosis.
Wang YC; Jeng CM; Wu CY; Chang HY; Huang YC; Wang YJ; Wang PC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 107(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 18445548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography.
Zander DR; Lander PH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 9709684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic individuals using positional stand-up magnetic resonance imaging.
Hirasawa Y; Bashir WA; Smith FW; Magnusson ML; Pope MH; Takahashi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(4):E136-40. PubMed ID: 17304123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.
Schonstrom NS; Bolender NF; Spengler DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1985 Nov; 10(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 4089655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomogram-myelography for evaluation of cross sections of cervical spinal morphology.
Naganawa T; Miyamoto K; Ogura H; Suzuki N; Shimizu K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20581762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI.
Huang KY; Lin RM; Lee YL; Li JD
Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1851-7. PubMed ID: 19526378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.
Schizas C; Theumann N; Burn A; Tansey R; Wardlaw D; Smith FW; Kulik G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):1919-24. PubMed ID: 20671589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation Between Dural Sac Size in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Zhou Z; Jin Z; Zhang P; Shan B; Zhou Z; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Zhou X
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e866-e873. PubMed ID: 31715409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moon ES; Kim HS; Park JO; Shin DE; Ha JW; Shim DJ; Kwak YH; Lee KI
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16385657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery.
Oba H; Takahashi J; Futatsugi T; Mogami Y; Shibata S; Ohji Y; Tanikawa H
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1088-94. PubMed ID: 23850257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?
Ozawa H; Kanno H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1191-7. PubMed ID: 22322611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiologic Factors Associated With the Dynamic Change of Dural Sac Diameter in Lumbar Spine: A Kinematic MRI Study.
Takahashi S; Lord EL; Hayashi T; Cohen JR; Lao L; Yao Q; Suzuki A; Nakamura H; Wang JC
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E827-E832. PubMed ID: 27352368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Axial loading during supine MRI for improved assessment of lumbar spine: comparison with standing MRI.
Charoensuk J; Laothamatas J; Sungkarat W; Worapruekjaru L; Hooncharoen B; Chousangsuntorn K
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):217-227. PubMed ID: 34939453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical and radiologic features of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation with neuropathic bladder.
Inui Y; Doita M; Ouchi K; Tsukuda M; Fujita N; Kurosaka M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 15082986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.
Danielson B; Willén J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2601-6. PubMed ID: 11725242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Postacchini F; Amatruda A; Morace GB; Perugia D
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1991 Sep; 17(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 1783545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.
Mahato NK; Sybert D; Law T; Clark B
Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(Suppl 1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27160826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between MRI and myelography in lumbar spinal canal stenosis for the decision of levels of decompression surgery.
Morita M; Miyauchi A; Okuda S; Oda T; Iwasaki M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20625326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defining clinically relevant values for developmental spinal stenosis: a large-scale magnetic resonance imaging study.
Cheung JP; Samartzis D; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):1067-76. PubMed ID: 24732859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
