167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21258307)
1. [Changes in the structure and clinical significance of the positive results of pretransfusion testing during the switching from tube test agglutination to gel microcolumn technique].
Petrusić-Kafedzić A; Ivanković Z; Ekinović S; Hutinović A; Ibrahimagić-Seper L
Med Glas (Zenica); 2010 Aug; 7(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 21258307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage papain-indirect antiglobulin test and LISS direct agglutination are not appropriate for pretransfusion screening for unexpected antibodies.
Pereira A; Mazzara R; Gelabert A; Castillo R
Haematologica; 1991; 76(6):475-8. PubMed ID: 1820984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three low-ionic-strength solutions for routine pretransfusion testing: antibody screening/identification, cross-matching, immune anti-ABO detection, and direct antiglobulin tests.
Kaspi E; Mallié F; Gouvitsos J; Dettori I; Chiaroni J; Ferrera V
Transfusion; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2772-3. PubMed ID: 20163691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Initial results of a prospective study with automated solid phase and column/agglutination techniques in screening for transfusion relevant IgG antibodies].
Simson G; Lynen R; Bialek C; Kloppmann T; Bargmann I; Köhler M
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():52-7. PubMed ID: 8374290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of irregular red cell antibodies: more than 3 years of experience with a gel technique and pooled screening cells.
Titlestad K; Georgsen J; Andersen H; Kristensen T
Vox Sang; 1997; 73(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 9407642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Manual polybrene test versus saline test as a means of detecting alloantibodies against red cells in the pretransfusion examination].
de Chirinos SM; Lichtiger B
Sangre (Barc); 1991 Feb; 36(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1853273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
Shulman IA; Maffei LM; Downes KA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction Caused by a Red Cell Antibody That Was Missed by Pretransfusion Testing Using Tube Method.
Shmookler A; Hamad D; Scrape S; Chen J
Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 48(3):258-261. PubMed ID: 28934518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gel-test: interpretation and value of a new technique for the detection of irregular antibodies.
Pottier C; Quillet P; Baufine-Ducrocq H
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1992; 50(10-11):679-85. PubMed ID: 1306951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Positive direct antiglobulin test (DAGT) using the gel system].
Frey-Wettstein M; Froelicher S
Beitr Infusionsther; 1992; 30():378-81. PubMed ID: 1284739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the gel test for antibody screening in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong; insensitivity for some cold antibodies that are reactive at 37 degrees C by conventional indirect antiglobulin tests.
Cheng G; Chan A; Chun M; Wong L
Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Mar; 17(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 7621635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Solid phase technique versus gel centrifugation for detection of erythrocyte antibodies--a prospective study comparison the 2 antibody detection tests].
Zeiler T; Thiele S; Kretschmer V
Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1996; 33():17-21. PubMed ID: 8974691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of optimal method for antibody identification in a reference laboratory.
Haywood JR; Moulds MK; Bryant BJ
Immunohematology; 2011; 27(4):146-50. PubMed ID: 22646070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of heel stick sample with placental blood sample for pretransfusion testing.
Aysola AE; Duque MA; Williams P; Alissa R
Transfusion; 2018 Sep; 58(9):2227-2231. PubMed ID: 30153354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of antibodies in acid eluates with the gel microcolumn assay.
Greco VA; Byrne KM; Procter JL; Stroncek DF
Transfusion; 2002 Jun; 42(6):698-701. PubMed ID: 12147021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the direct antiglobulin test].
Juraković-Loncar N; Hundrić-Haspl Z; Balija M; Grgicević D
Lijec Vjesn; 1995; 117(11-12):274-7. PubMed ID: 8691973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test (autocontrol) in pretransfusion testing revisited.
Judd WJ; Barnes BA; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Averill DB; Butch SH
Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3705135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Critical analysis of the routine use of the direct antiglobulin test in 22,517 cross-matching tests].
López J; Fernández Villalta MJ; de la Calle C; Biurrum M; Gómez-Reino F; Fernández-Rañada JM
Sangre (Barc); 1990 Feb; 35(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 2333579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The gel centrifugation test: comparison of antibody identification at 37 degrees C with antibody identification at room temperature].
Hitzler WE; Ulrich M; Däumer C; Beeser H
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():61-3. PubMed ID: 8374292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
