329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21258904)
1. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
Santangelo V; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when attention is otherwise engaged.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17311484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
Lu S; Han S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is top-down about contingent capture?
Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence of strategic effects in the modulation of orienting of attention.
Nougier V; Rossi B; Alain C; Taddei F
Ergonomics; 1996 Sep; 39(9):1119-33. PubMed ID: 8681933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.
Anderson BA; Folk CL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20139450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
