These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21258911)

  • 1. Individual working memory capacity is uniquely correlated with feature-based attention when combined with spatial attention.
    Bengson JJ; Mangun GR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):86-102. PubMed ID: 21258911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.
    Bleckley MK; Durso FT; Crutchfield JM; Engle RW; Khanna MM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):884-9. PubMed ID: 15000535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial and nonspatial working memory and visual search.
    Takahashi J; Hatakeyama T
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 21879636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working-memory performance is related to spatial breadth of attention.
    Kreitz C; Furley P; Memmert D; Simons DJ
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25468209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object.
    Sasin E; Fougnie D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19499. PubMed ID: 33177574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid learning of rapid temporal contexts.
    Mayberry CR; Livesey EJ; Dux PE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 20551368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the interrelations among multiple paradigms of visual attention: an individual differences approach.
    Huang L; Mo L; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):414-28. PubMed ID: 22250865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principal component analysis of behavioural individual differences suggests that particular aspects of visual working memory may relate to specific aspects of attention.
    Machizawa MG; Driver J
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1518-26. PubMed ID: 21130786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task interference in visual working memory: a limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval.
    Fougnie D; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1831-41. PubMed ID: 19933566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43101. PubMed ID: 22952636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.
    Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 21310945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial working memory load impairs signal enhancement, but not attentional orienting.
    Han SW; Kim MS
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):916-23. PubMed ID: 18613637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible working memory representation of the relationship between an object and its location as revealed by interactions with attention.
    Sala JB; Courtney SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 19801613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.
    Berry AS; Zanto TP; Rutman AM; Clapp WC; Gazzaley A
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1779-89. PubMed ID: 19587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load.
    Vickery TJ; Sussman RS; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1358-71. PubMed ID: 20853996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.