These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21259314)

  • 1. On responder analyses when a continuous variable is dichotomized and measurement error is present.
    Kunz M
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):137-55. PubMed ID: 21259314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error.
    Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the estimation of change from baseline in a continuous outcome measure in the clinical trial setting.
    Mayer-Hamblett N; Kronmal RA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 15837448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Chan KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?
    Walter SD; Forbes A; Chan S; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21259307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjustment for baseline measurement error in randomized controlled trials induces bias.
    Chan SF; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Walter SD
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 15296815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the instrumental variables estimator to analyze noninferiority trials with noncompliance.
    Kim MY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):745-58. PubMed ID: 20496203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
    Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The population risk as an explanatory variable in research synthesis of clinical trials.
    McIntosh MW
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1713-28. PubMed ID: 8870154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Six-month paroxetine treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder: continuous versus intermittent treatment protocols.
    Wu KY; Liu CY; Hsiao MC
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 62(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18289149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size determination for hierarchical longitudinal designs with differential attrition rates.
    Roy A; Bhaumik DK; Aryal S; Gibbons RD
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 17825003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of clinical data with breached blindness.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 15083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.
    Borm GF; Munneke M; Lemmers O; van Zuijlen M
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3498-510. PubMed ID: 16981185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case-only analysis of treatment-covariate interactions in clinical trials.
    Vittinghoff E; Bauer DC
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):769-76. PubMed ID: 16984319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.