These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21261417)

  • 1. Unpacking unpacking: greater detail can reduce perceived likelihood.
    Redden JP; Frederick S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 21261417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
    Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. College students' awareness of irrational judgments on gambling tasks: a dual-process account.
    Amsel E; Close J; Sadler E; Klaczynski PA
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):293-317. PubMed ID: 19455857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks.
    Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Another look at why people are reluctant to exchange lottery tickets.
    Risen JL; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jul; 93(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 17605585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty.
    Hansson P; Juslin P; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.