These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21261424)

  • 1. Bogus concerns about the false prototype enhancement effect.
    Homa D; Hout MC; Milliken L; Milliken AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 21261424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Array training in a categorization task.
    Homa D; Powell D; Ferguson R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 23713978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 15285123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition.
    Homa D; Goldhardt B; Burruel-Homa L; Smith JC
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 8350744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2088-96. PubMed ID: 18265623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prototype-distortion category learning: a two-phase learning process across a distributed network.
    Little DM; Thulborn KR
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 16406637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related fMRI of category learning: differences in classification and feedback networks.
    Little DM; Shin SS; Sisco SM; Thulborn KR
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16426719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Category transfer in sequential causal learning: the unbroken mechanism hypothesis.
    Hagmayer Y; Meder B; von Sydow M; Waldmann MR
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 35(5):842-73. PubMed ID: 21609354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prototypical category learning in high-functioning autism.
    Vladusich T; Olu-Lafe O; Kim DS; Tager-Flusberg H; Grossberg S
    Autism Res; 2010 Oct; 3(5):226-36. PubMed ID: 20717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Category representation for classification and feature inference.
    Johansen MK; Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1433-58. PubMed ID: 16393056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
    Olsson H; Wennerholm P; Lyxzèn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 15238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haptic concepts in the blind.
    Homa D; Kahol K; Tripathi P; Bratton L; Panchanathan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 19429952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the psychological structure of transformational knowledge in visual and haptic intramodal conditions using multidimensional scaling.
    Do PT; Homa D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):443-64. PubMed ID: 23265010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.