These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21261426)

  • 1. Generalizing linguistic structures under high attention demands.
    Toro JM; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):493-501. PubMed ID: 21261426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primitive computations in speech processing.
    Endress AD; Mehler J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2187-209. PubMed ID: 19418378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention.
    Toro JM; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S
    Cognition; 2005 Sep; 97(2):B25-34. PubMed ID: 16226557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infant rule learning facilitated by speech.
    Marcus GF; Fernandes KJ; Johnson SP
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 17576276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination and generalization along a simple dimension: peak shift and rule-governed responding.
    Livesey EJ; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):554-65. PubMed ID: 19839707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition.
    Carreiras M; Vergara M; Barber H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1803-17. PubMed ID: 16269115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream.
    Endress AD; Bonatti LL
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):247-99. PubMed ID: 17083927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependent measure and time constraints modulate the competition between conflicting feature-based and rule-based generalization processes.
    Cobos PL; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Morís J; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):515-527. PubMed ID: 27841447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants.
    Pons F; Toro JM
    Cognition; 2010 Sep; 116(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 20557881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental differences in children's context-dependent word learning.
    Vlach HA; Sandhofer CM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Feb; 108(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 21074169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: comparing monolingual and bilingual infants.
    Mattock K; Polka L; Rvachew S; Krehm M
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jan; 13(1):229-43. PubMed ID: 20121879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
    Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of concurrent load on feature- and rule-based generalization in human contingency learning.
    Wills AJ; Graham S; Koh Z; McLaren IP; Rolland MD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 21500927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When does length cause the word length effect?
    Jalbert A; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):338-53. PubMed ID: 21171805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory.
    Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):653-64. PubMed ID: 22250906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.
    Knight JB; Meeks JT; Marsh RL; Cook GI; Brewer GA; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 21299328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.